THE PRODUCTION LINE FOR CODING AGENTS
Describe the work; as many of your own Claude Code or Codex agents as you choose each claim a task in parallel, and you review one checked pull request.
Ready to be picked up
Actively being worked on
In review
Completed
Who works on what. Nothing done twice. Nothing counted on an agent's word. Everything landing in one place you can review. 10xs is that line, end to end: plan, tasks, agents in parallel, a check, one pull request.
As many agents as you choose, each on its own task, in parallel — then one checked pull request to review.
Describe the project. 10xs drafts the facts and plan and breaks it into tasks with acceptance criteria. You edit and approve. This is the only place 10xs runs a model on its servers.
A task can be claimed only once, and a blocked task can't be claimed. A task runs as long as it needs; if a machine goes silent for 30 minutes, another machine can pick it up.
Run as many of your own Claude Code or Codex agents as you choose. Each claims its own task on your machine, on its own branch.
The runtime runs the task's tests and refuses handover on a failing exit code. The gate then decides done from a fixed rule table — no model. Every decision leaves a receipt.
Each task works on its own branch, carries its own receipt and lands on the sprint branch as one commit. The sprint's pull request is your review unit.
An agent that says "done" has made a claim. The gate turns it into a record: what ran, on which commit, with what result — and how strongly it was checked. The receipt states its own grade:
Failed tasks go back to the queue with the test output attached.
Rules you can read, not a model's opinion. Everything that moves a task, checks it or marks it done is a fixed rule. A model drafts your plan, and that's the only place 10xs uses one on its servers.
I've spent 15+ years in software. I started out running teams and taught myself to code along the way, working with startups and teams across the US, Europe and Australia.
When coding agents arrived, the bottleneck moved. Writing code got cheap; trusting it didn't. An agent saying "done" isn't the same as done. So I built a production line where an agent's work is checked before it counts.
Today my work is built with 10xs, and I'm responsible for what it ships.
On a normal day, up to ten Claude Code and Codex lanes build 10xs in parallel, each in its own tree. Our last round ran five lanes and went from cut to release gate in about five hours. One of its four coding lanes failed its honest run on a real server, so it was carried to the next round instead of merged.
— Chethan Prabhakar · chethanprabhakar.com · LinkedIn
Solo builders & technical founders
Turn the plan into tasks, run agents in parallel overnight, and wake up to one pull request with a receipt for every task.
10xs for solo builders →Engineering teams
One board across every engineer, machine and agent. Your CI's pass shows on the receipt. Reviewers get one sprint PR in which each task passed its check, receipt attached.
10xs for teams →Your own repo stays where it is: an agent on your machine reads it and sends 10xs a summary you approve, and the 10xs runtime pushes to your git remote. 10xs reads a single file from a public repo only to show it beside a report. Starting from an idea? 10xs hosts the project's repo for you at code.10xs.ai, and the 10xs runtime on your machine pushes your agents' work to it.
Claude Code and Codex today, any number at once, mixed on one board. They run under your own accounts; 10xs coordinates the tasks.
No. For your own GitHub repo, the runtime uses the git and gh login already on your machine to push branches and open the sprint pull request.
Keep it. Your tracker stays the backlog; the 10xs board is where agent work is claimed, run and checked. We build 10xs this way ourselves, with GitHub Issues alongside the board.
Free plan: one project, no card. It stays free after beta. Paid plans for more projects will come later, and we'll publish pricing before they launch.
Plan it, connect your agents with one command, and judge the pull request yourself.
Questions? We're here. Contact us