Skip to content

document internal test function - #3900

Merged
mattdowle merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
test-fun
Oct 1, 2019
Merged

mattdowle merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
test-fun

Conversation

@jangorecki

@jangorecki jangorecki commented Sep 21, 2019 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 21, 2019 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #3900 into master will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #3900      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   99.42%   99.4%   -0.03%     
=========================================
  Files          72      72              
  Lines       13502   13642     +140     
=========================================
+ Hits        13425   13561     +136     
- Misses         77      81       +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/test.data.table.R 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/utils.c 98.1% <0%> (-1.9%) ⬇️
src/dogroups.c 96.84% <0%> (-0.14%) ⬇️
src/rbindlist.c 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/froll.c 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
R/tables.R 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/assign.c 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
R/utils.R 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/init.c 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/frolladaptive.c 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a5537dc...e7ea12a. Read the comment docs.

@mattdowle mattdowle added this to the 1.12.4 milestone Oct 1, 2019
@mattdowle

mattdowle commented Oct 1, 2019 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Decrease in coverage is false; that's just because we didn't merge master into this PR so it's comparing this older branch against latest master. In this case, due to the nature of this PR, fine to skip. Coverage will update on master after merge.

@mattdowle
mattdowle merged commit 448a51e into master Oct 1, 2019
@mattdowle
mattdowle deleted the test-fun branch October 1, 2019 23:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test function is insensitive for NaN vs NA difference

2 participants