Skip to content

[SPARK-1143] Separate pool tests into their own suite. - #3967

Closed
kayousterhout wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
kayousterhout:SPARK-1143
Closed

kayousterhout wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
kayousterhout:SPARK-1143

Conversation

@kayousterhout

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The current TaskSchedulerImplSuite includes some tests that are
actually for the TaskSchedulerImpl, but the remainder of the tests avoid using
the TaskSchedulerImpl entirely, and actually test the pool and scheduling
algorithm mechanisms. This commit separates the pool/scheduling algorithm
tests into their own suite, and also simplifies those tests.

The pull request replaces #339.

The current TaskSchedulerImplSuite includes some tests that are
actually for the TaskSchedulerImpl, but many of the tests avoid using
the TaskSchedulerImpl entirely, and actually test the pool and scheduling
algorithm mechanisms. This commit separates the pool/scheduling algorithm
tests into their own suite, simplifies those tests, and attempts to
more helpfully comment the fair scheduler test.

The pull request replaces apache#339.
@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Jan 9, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #25300 has started for PR 3967 at commit 8a898c4.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@rxin

rxin commented Jan 9, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM ...

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Jan 9, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #25300 has finished for PR 3967 at commit 8a898c4.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class PoolSuite extends FunSuite with LocalSparkContext

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25300/
Test FAILed.

@kayousterhout

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Jenkins, retest this please

@kayousterhout

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tdas what's the status with these (seemingly unreliable) Kafka tests? Should they be disabled?

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Jan 9, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #25308 has started for PR 3967 at commit 8a898c4.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Jan 9, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #25308 has finished for PR 3967 at commit 8a898c4.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class PoolSuite extends FunSuite with LocalSparkContext

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25308/
Test PASSed.

@pwendell

pwendell commented Jan 9, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good, 'Ill pull it in.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in b6aa557 Jan 9, 2015
@kayousterhout
kayousterhout deleted the SPARK-1143 branch January 19, 2015 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants