Skip to content

Backport PR #18374 on branch v7.1.x (Bump OpenAstronomy/github-actions-workflows from 1.16.0 to 2.1.0 in /.github/workflows in the actions group) - #18377

Merged
pllim merged 1 commit into
astropy:v7.1.xfrom
meeseeksmachine:auto-backport-of-pr-18374-on-v7.1.x
Jul 1, 2025
Merged

pllim merged 1 commit into
astropy:v7.1.xfrom
meeseeksmachine:auto-backport-of-pr-18374-on-v7.1.x

Conversation

@meeseeksmachine

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Backport PR #18374: Bump OpenAstronomy/github-actions-workflows from 1.16.0 to 2.1.0 in /.github/workflows in the actions group

…s from 1.16.0 to 2.1.0 in /.github/workflows in the actions group
@lumberbot-app lumberbot-app Bot added this to the v7.1.1 milestone Jul 1, 2025
@lumberbot-app lumberbot-app Bot added testing Release no-changelog-entry-needed Build all wheels Run all the wheel builds rather than just a selection dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code backport-v7.1.x labels Jul 1, 2025
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.

  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals?
  • Do the proposed changes follow the Astropy coding guidelines?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy testing guidelines?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy documentation guidelines?
  • Is rebase and/or squash necessary? If so, please provide the author with appropriate instructions. Also see instructions for rebase and squash.
  • Did the CI pass? If no, are the failures related? If you need to run daily and weekly cron jobs as part of the PR, please apply the "Extra CI" label. Codestyle issues can be fixed by the bot.
  • Is a change log needed? If yes, did the change log check pass? If no, add the "no-changelog-entry-needed" label. If this is a manual backport, use the "skip-changelog-checks" label unless special changelog handling is necessary.
  • Is this a big PR that makes a "What's new?" entry worthwhile and if so, is (1) a "what's new" entry included in this PR and (2) the "whatsnew-needed" label applied?
  • At the time of adding the milestone, if the milestone set requires a backport to release branch(es), apply the appropriate "backport-X.Y.x" label(s) before merge.

@pllim
pllim merged commit c9bc67e into astropy:v7.1.x Jul 1, 2025
@neutrinoceros

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pllim backporting this without a release note isn't ideal in my opinion. See #18159 (comment)

@pllim

pllim commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh ooops sorry! Do you have a preference? Should be no problem to revert but it does bloat up the history if you plan to add it back in anyway. Would adding a note make more sense at this point? Hope you can advise. Thanks!

@neutrinoceros

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#18159 has that note, I think it makes sense to backport it too, if you agree to it. I just want us to coordinate the move before I change #18159 (the note was originally meant for 7.2.0)

@pllim

pllim commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK let's talk there.

@pllim

pllim commented Oct 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backport of change log for this backport at #18684

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Build all wheels Run all the wheel builds rather than just a selection dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code Release testing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants