Repository navigation
Histogram Blur / Smoothing #56
Description
Activity
Mind blown after seeing this
Due to the central limit theorem, the Gaussian can be approximated by several runs of a very simple filter such as the moving average. The simple moving average corresponds to convolution with the constant B-spline ( a rectangular pulse ), and, for example, four iterations of a moving average yields a cubic B-spline as filter window which approximates the Gaussian quite well.
from Wikipedia: Gaussian filter.
Makes me wonder if we could add a moving average function, then use that to implement
blur.I did an experiment and found that moving averages do seem to converge on what looks like a Gaussian.
https://bl.ocks.org/curran/853fa00b8f0732fb2bee7fccfd7b4523Also related to d3/d3-shape#43
Reacted by Mike Bostock, Micah Stubbs, James Cagalawan and Philippe RivièreI keep coming across scenarios where a bit of smoothing would be useful, for example this one:
Proposed implementation (from Histogram Smoothing):
const blur = (data, property) => data.map((d, i) => { const previous = (i === 0) ? i : i - 1; const next = (i === data.length - 1) ? i : i + 1; const sum = data[previous][property] + d[property] + data[next][property]; d[property] = sum / 3; return d; });
Moving average: https://observablehq.com/@d3/moving-average
(would be great to have it in d3-array)Reacted by Curran KelleherAlso did a Gaussian Smoothing notebook
https://observablehq.com/@fil/gaussian-smoothing
Obvious advantage over moving average is it's smoother :) It shows quite well on the electricity dataset which has a 24h base period.Here's an application of that blur function.
I think we would also want optimized 2D or n-D blurs, like we have in https://github.com/d3/d3-contour/blob/master/src/blur.js (note the number of TODO in the comments ;-) ).
Yes that would be very cool!
One "problem" I notice with the Gaussian blur approach of repeated averaging is that the slope of the curves appear to tend towards zero the closer you get to the endpoints (see the red rectangle in the image).
Is this a known problem with Gaussian blur in general? How to folks usually deal with this?
To me, it seems to skew the data into showing something that's not there (the "flattening out" effect at the end of the curve), which make the dataviz misleading. The original data does not seem to exhibit that behavior.
I'm thinking to just remove the data points that could have been indirectly impacted by the edge case - so chop off
numIterationsvalues from the beginning and end of the timeseries.Here's a revised implementation, taking that end flattening effect into account:
export const blur = (data, property, numIterations) => { const n = data.length; for (let j = 0; j < numIterations; j++) { for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) { const previous = data[i === 0 ? i : i - 1]; const current = data[i]; const next = data[i === n - 1 ? i : i + 1]; const sum = previous[property] + current[property] + next[property]; current[property] = sum / 3; } } // Chop off the ends, as they may represent misleading "flattening". return data.slice(numIterations, data.length - numIterations); };
Here's a fork which uses my gaussian kernel blurring; it doesn't seem to suffer from the problem you describe?
Very nice! Indeed, the problem is not there. The problem must lie in the repeated iteration technique.
This new notebook shows how we could use the same API for 1D and 2D blur:
https://observablehq.com/@fil/moving-average-blurI've also straightened the implementation a little to get more juice out of it (about 30% faster in my tests). I've tried to implemented gaussian blur but it does not compete at all in terms of speed.
And here is another fork, this time using the d3.blur proposal.
Reacted by Curran KelleherTo close the loop here, the implementation was published as a separate package https://github.com/Fil/array-blur .
Reacted by Philippe Rivière
It would be useful to have a "blur" function to approximate kernel density estimation.
This function would accept the output from
histogram, conceptually looking something like:Original discussion in d3/d3-contour#7 (comment)
The implementation could be similar to blurX or blurY in d3-contour.
This article may be relevant: Convolve n Square Pulses to Gaussian.