Skip to content

Migrate SDK shards into separate builders #77947

Closed

Description

@keyonghan

Builders with shards have been consuming extra trigger bots, and waste lots of resources when rerunning (have to rerun all shards even a single subshard fails). Additionally it has caused difficulty to view results via LUCI UI: #64208.

This is tracking the process to separate shards into separate builders.

Try:

  • Create separate builder configs for builders (with shards)
  • Enable new separate builders in try_builder.json for presubmit
  • Remove old builders (with shards) from try_builder.json for presubmit
  • clean up configs for old try builders (with shards) (keep for a couple of days before removing, in case failures if not rebased)

Prod:

  • Create separate builder configs for builders (with shards)
  • Enable new separate builders in prod_builder.json for postsubmit
  • Remove old builders (with shards) from prod_builder.json for postsubmit
  • clean up configs for old builders (with shards)

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Mar 11, 2021
  2. added
    infra: metricsInfrastructure metrics-related issues
    P1High-priority issues at the top of the work list
    team-infraOwned by Infrastructure team
    on Mar 11, 2021
  3. CaseyHillers commented on Mar 17, 2021

    @CaseyHillers
    Contributor

    Do we plan to promote the new linux builders to flaky=false before migrating the other platforms?

    When we did the devicelab luci migration, one complaint was infra created too many flaky tasks in the build dashboard to make it actionable.

  4. keyonghan commented on Mar 17, 2021

    @keyonghan
    ContributorAuthor

    Since they are stable, here is the pr to remove flakiness: #78483

  5. github-actions commented on Aug 4, 2021

    @github-actions

    This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. If you are still experiencing a similar issue, please open a new bug, including the output of flutter doctor -v and a minimal reproduction of the issue.

  6. locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators on Aug 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

P1High-priority issues at the top of the work listinfra: metricsInfrastructure metrics-related issuesteam-infraOwned by Infrastructure team

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions