Repository navigation
[CP-stable]Fix Actions.handler to forward the intent type to maybeFind - #192203
Conversation
…191052) `Actions.handler` was calling `Actions.maybeFind(context)` without an explicit type argument or the intent, so downward inference resolved `T` to `Intent` and the action lookup used the literal `Intent` type instead of the intent's concrete runtime type. Since apps register actions keyed by their concrete `Intent` subtype, the lookup always missed and `handler` returned `null` for every intent. This regressed in flutter#180883 and first shipped in 3.47.0. The fix forwards the type and intent explicitly: `Actions.maybeFind<T>(context, intent: intent)`. ## Tests Adds regression tests for `Actions.handler`: it now finds and invokes the bound action for the intent's runtime type, and still returns null when the action is disabled or when no matching action is found. The first test fails without the fix. Fixes flutter#191045. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [AI contribution guidelines] and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [AI contribution guidelines]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#ai-contribution-guidelines [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md Co-authored-by: Victor Sanni <[email protected]>
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
@justinmc please fill out the PR description above, afterwards the release team will review this request. |
|
This pull request was opened from and to a release candidate branch. This should only be done as part of the official Flutter release process. If you are attempting to make a regular contribution to the Flutter project, please close this PR and follow the instructions at Tree Hygiene for detailed instructions on contributing to Flutter. Reviewers: Use caution before merging pull requests to release branches. Ensure the proper procedure has been followed. |
justinmc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM 👍 . This is quite a high impact regression with a simple fix.
75a5dd9
into
flutter:flutter-3.47-candidate.0
This pull request is created by automatic cherry pick workflow
Please fill in the form below, and a flutter domain expert will evaluate this cherry pick request.
Issue Link:
What is the link to the issue this cherry-pick is addressing?
#191045
Impact Description:
What is the impact (ex. visual jank on Samsung phones, app crash, cannot ship an iOS app)?
Does it impact development (ex. flutter doctor crashes when Android Studio is installed),
or the shipping of production apps (the app crashes on launch).
This information is for domain experts and release engineers to understand the consequences of saying yes or no to the cherry pick.
All users of the
Actions.handlerAPI on all platforms are broken by this bug.Changelog Description:
Explain this cherry pick:
See best practices for examples.
[flutter/191045] When
calling Actions.handleron all platforms,nullwas always returned.Workaround:
Is there a workaround for this issue?
End users would need to reimplement Actions.handler and Action._isEnabled, or switch to master/main channel, or revert to 3.44
Risk:
What is the risk level of this cherry-pick?
Test Coverage:
Are you confident that your fix is well-tested by automated tests?
Validation Steps:
What are the steps to validate that this fix works?
Compare use of Actions.handler on Flutter 3.47 (broken) vs 3.44.
When broken,
callbackis always null. When fixed it is the VoidCallback that has been set up to handle the given intent.