Skip to content

[email protected] pins google-auth-library to exact "10.5.0" (was "^10.1.0"), breaking deduplication #8678

Description

@baraknaveh

Summary

[email protected] declares "google-auth-library": "10.5.0" — an exact version with no caret. The previous release, 8.0.1, used "^10.1.0". This prevents google-auth-library from deduplicating for any consumer that also depends on a newer google-auth-library directly, installing two copies.

Where it changed

The caret was dropped in the monorepo migration commit 36277d77 (PR #7606, "chore: google cloud node core migration"), which bulk-pinned sibling cross-dependencies to exact versions across core/packages/*. nodejs-googleapis-common was one of several affected — gaxios, gcp-metadata, etc. got the same treatment.

Current source: core/packages/nodejs-googleapis-common/package.json still shows "google-auth-library": "10.5.0".

Why it's a problem

The pin is already stale — the same monorepo ships [email protected]. A consumer that depends on google-auth-library@^10.7.0 directly and on googleapis (which pulls googleapis-common@^8.0.0 → 8.0.2) ends up with both 10.5.0 and 10.7.0 installed. In TypeScript this breaks compilation, because the two OAuth2Client classes are structurally incompatible (each declares a private redirectUri):

error TS2322: Type 'OAuth2Client' ([email protected]) is not assignable to
type 'OAuth2Client' ([email protected]).
  Types have separate declarations of a private property 'redirectUri'.

Repro

A package depending on googleapis@^173 and google-auth-library@^10.7.0, type-checking any use of google.auth.OAuth2 against google.drive(...).

Note

8.0.2 has no source changes vs 8.0.1 (no commits touched the package src/ between the two releases) — it appears to be a dependency-repinning/version-bump release, so the exact pin looks like an unintended artifact of the migration tooling rather than a deliberate constraint.

Expected

Restore a caret range for google-auth-library (e.g. ^10.1.0 or ^10.7.0) in googleapis-common, and ideally across the other siblings repinned in #7606.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions