Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 3, 2024. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 3, 2024. It is now read-only.

Support GHC 8 #5

Description

@3noch

I may be doing something wrong, but I'm having trouble getting this to build with GHC 8.

Activity

  1. qnikst commented on Jan 26, 2017

    @qnikst
    Contributor

    Hello, currently this package in not actively maintained by it's primary maintainer. I'll try to take a look into this issue but I can't guarantee that I'll do that promptly.

  2. 3noch commented on Jan 26, 2017

    @3noch
    ContributorAuthor

    @qnikst Thanks so much! I actually figured out the issue. It was my fault.

    On a side note, is this package safe to rely on for the future without a primary maintainer?

  3. qnikst commented on Jan 26, 2017

    @qnikst
    Contributor

    Major bugs will be fixed but may be not very promptly. All PRs will be reviewed and merged possibly with delays. Versions bounds will be updated upon a notice. Unless somebody will volunteer to drive this package forward you should not expect much improvements. I'm not sure that I can say that I totally trust codebase so possibly there is a room for improvement , but as far as I know there are some users of this package and it works for them.
    I think such situation will stay at least in the middle term.

  4. qnikst commented on Jan 26, 2017

    @qnikst
    Contributor

    What I've written is only about distributed process platform packages like extras, client-sever. Network transport family, distributed-process itself and d-p-asynx are properly maintained.

  5. 3noch commented on Jan 26, 2017

    @3noch
    ContributorAuthor

    Ok thanks so much for this detail. I'm very, very new to the cloud haskell world. How critical is this package to the cloud haskell effort?

  6. 3noch commented on Jan 26, 2017

    @3noch
    ContributorAuthor

    Perhaps this is all documented somewhere so forgive me if I'm asking for info that is readily available.

  7. qnikst commented on Jan 26, 2017

    @qnikst
    Contributor

    In our practice we primarily use distributed-process, network-transport-tcp, network-transport-inmemory, distributed-process-async, and build our primitives on top. There are also distributed-process-platform with a number of packages inside that try to mimic Erlang's OTR, they are not critical for writing code.

  8. 3noch commented on Jan 26, 2017

    @3noch
    ContributorAuthor

    Thanks very much. I'll close this issue since GHC 8 support is already working.

  9. hyperthunk commented on Jan 30, 2017

    @hyperthunk
    Member

    Sorry, I'm trying to get back to maintaining these packages but have not had access to a working environment for quite some time now. Hopefully will be back on board soon but efforts to get back to the project stalled last year.

  10. hyperthunk commented on Feb 20, 2017

    @hyperthunk
    Member

    @3noch please ping me if you need any assistance, this package is getting proper attention at last!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions