Trust map for HyperAgent? #87

Hi HyperAgent maintainers,

I was looking at HyperAgent and noticed a trust/documentation gap that may matter for adoption: browser automation agent; strong safety-boundary fit, but likely more commercial.

The first useful pass would be to prepare a capability reality map and external-action boundary review.

I am offering a fixed-scope repo documentation rescue plus agent safety map.

The deliverable is simple:

• what the agent can actually do today
• what is mock, dry-run, or live
• where approval is required before external actions
• what proof or receipts exist
• the next safest upgrade that would make the project more credible

I only need the public repo. No account access, no secrets, no live changes, and no external actions.

The entry pass is 199 USD.

I can send a one-page sample outline first, based only on the public repo, so you can see whether it would be useful.

Would that be helpful for HyperAgent?

Repo I reviewed: https://github.com/hyperbrowserai/HyperAgent