This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathbasic.lean
More file actions
857 lines (632 loc) · 38.6 KB
/
Copy pathbasic.lean
File metadata and controls
857 lines (632 loc) · 38.6 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import order.prop_instances
/-!
# Heyting algebras
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
An Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `¬`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `¬a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `generalized_heyting_algebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `generalized_coheyting_algebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `heyting_algebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `coheyting_algebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `biheyting_algebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## Notation
* `⇨`: Heyting implication
* `\`: Difference
* `¬`: Heyting negation
* `ᶜ`: (Pseudo-)complement
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
open function order_dual
universes u
variables {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
/-- Syntax typeclass for Heyting implication `⇨`. -/
@[notation_class] class has_himp (α : Type*) := (himp : α → α → α)
/-- Syntax typeclass for Heyting negation `¬`.
The difference between `has_compl` and `has_hnot` is that the former belongs to Heyting algebras,
while the latter belongs to co-Heyting algebras. They are both pseudo-complements, but `compl`
underestimates while `hnot` overestimates. In boolean algebras, they are equal. See `hnot_eq_compl`.
-/
@[notation_class] class has_hnot (α : Type*) := (hnot : α → α)
export has_himp (himp) has_sdiff (sdiff) has_hnot (hnot)
infixr ` ⇨ `:60 := himp
prefix `¬`:72 := hnot
instance [has_himp α] [has_himp β] : has_himp (α × β) := ⟨λ a b, (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance [has_hnot α] [has_hnot β] : has_hnot (α × β) := ⟨λ a, (¬a.1, ¬a.2)⟩
instance [has_sdiff α] [has_sdiff β] : has_sdiff (α × β) := ⟨λ a b, (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance [has_compl α] [has_compl β] : has_compl (α × β) := ⟨λ a, (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
@[simp] lemma fst_himp [has_himp α] [has_himp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_himp [has_himp α] [has_himp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_hnot [has_hnot α] [has_hnot β] (a : α × β) : (¬a).1 = ¬a.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_hnot [has_hnot α] [has_hnot β] (a : α × β) : (¬a).2 = ¬a.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_sdiff [has_sdiff α] [has_sdiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_sdiff [has_sdiff α] [has_sdiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_compl [has_compl α] [has_compl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_compl [has_compl α] [has_compl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ := rfl
namespace pi
variables {π : ι → Type*}
instance [Π i, has_himp (π i)] : has_himp (Π i, π i) := ⟨λ a b i, a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [Π i, has_hnot (π i)] : has_hnot (Π i, π i) := ⟨λ a i, ¬a i⟩
lemma himp_def [Π i, has_himp (π i)] (a b : Π i, π i) : (a ⇨ b) = λ i, a i ⇨ b i := rfl
lemma hnot_def [Π i, has_hnot (π i)] (a : Π i, π i) : ¬a = λ i, ¬a i := rfl
@[simp] lemma himp_apply [Π i, has_himp (π i)] (a b : Π i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma hnot_apply [Π i, has_hnot (π i)] (a : Π i, π i) (i : ι) : (¬a) i = ¬a i := rfl
end pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`.
This generalizes `heyting_algebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class generalized_heyting_algebra (α : Type*) extends lattice α, has_top α, has_himp α :=
(le_top : ∀ a : α, a ≤ ⊤)
(le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c)
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`.
This generalizes `coheyting_algebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class generalized_coheyting_algebra (α : Type*) extends lattice α, has_bot α, has_sdiff α :=
(bot_le : ∀ a : α, ⊥ ≤ a)
(sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c)
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`. -/
class heyting_algebra (α : Type*) extends generalized_heyting_algebra α, has_bot α, has_compl α :=
(bot_le : ∀ a : α, ⊥ ≤ a)
(himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ)
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`. -/
class coheyting_algebra (α : Type*)
extends generalized_coheyting_algebra α, has_top α, has_hnot α :=
(le_top : ∀ a : α, a ≤ ⊤)
(top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ¬a)
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class biheyting_algebra (α : Type*) extends heyting_algebra α, has_sdiff α, has_hnot α :=
(sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c)
(top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ¬a)
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top [generalized_heyting_algebra α] : order_top α :=
{ ..‹generalized_heyting_algebra α› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot [generalized_coheyting_algebra α] :
order_bot α :=
{ ..‹generalized_coheyting_algebra α› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order [heyting_algebra α] : bounded_order α :=
{ ..‹heyting_algebra α› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order [coheyting_algebra α] : bounded_order α :=
{ ..‹coheyting_algebra α› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra [biheyting_algebra α] : coheyting_algebra α :=
{ ..‹biheyting_algebra α› }
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def heyting_algebra.of_himp [distrib_lattice α] [bounded_order α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : heyting_algebra α :=
{ himp := himp,
compl := λ a, himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := λ a, rfl,
..‹distrib_lattice α›, ..‹bounded_order α› }
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def heyting_algebra.of_compl [distrib_lattice α] [bounded_order α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : heyting_algebra α :=
{ himp := λ a, (⊔) (compl a),
compl := compl,
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := λ a, sup_bot_eq,
..‹distrib_lattice α›, ..‹bounded_order α› }
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff [distrib_lattice α] [bounded_order α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : coheyting_algebra α :=
{ sdiff := sdiff,
hnot := λ a, sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := λ a, rfl,
..‹distrib_lattice α›, ..‹bounded_order α› }
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def coheyting_algebra.of_hnot [distrib_lattice α] [bounded_order α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : coheyting_algebra α :=
{ sdiff := λ a b, (a ⊓ hnot b),
hnot := hnot,
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := λ a, top_inf_eq,
..‹distrib_lattice α›, ..‹bounded_order α› }
section generalized_heyting_algebra
variables [generalized_heyting_algebra α] {a b c d : α}
/- In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heyting_algebra`. -/
-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r`
@[simp] lemma le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c := generalized_heyting_algebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r`
lemma le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r`
lemma le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
-- `p → q → p`
lemma le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a := le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q`
@[simp] lemma le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
-- `p → p`
@[simp] lemma himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ := top_le_iff.1 $ le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q`
lemma himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b := le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q`
lemma inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ←le_himp_iff]
-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q`
@[simp] lemma inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left $ by rw [inf_comm, ←le_himp_iff]) $ inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p`
@[simp] lemma himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [←top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p`
@[simp] lemma himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ := himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp] lemma top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a := eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ b, by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r`
lemma himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ d, by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r`
@[simp] lemma himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c :=
begin
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ←inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc],
exact inf_le_left,
end
-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r`
lemma himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp] lemma himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
lemma himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ d, by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
lemma sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ d, by { rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff], simp_rw le_himp_comm }
lemma himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b := le_himp_iff.2 $ himp_inf_le.trans h
lemma himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 $ (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
lemma himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans $ himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp] lemma sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b) ⇨ a = b ⇨ a :=
by rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp] lemma sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b) ⇨ b = a ⇨ b :=
by rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
lemma codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a :=
by { conv_rhs { rw ←@top_himp _ _ a }, rw [←h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left] }
lemma codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b := h.symm.himp_eq_right
lemma codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ (a ⊓ b) = b :=
by rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
lemma codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ (a ⊓ b) = a :=
by rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
lemma codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
lemma le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b := le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
lemma himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c :=
by { rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ←le_himp_iff], exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp }
lemma himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm $ le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance generalized_heyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice : distrib_lattice α :=
distrib_lattice.of_inf_sup_le $ λ a b c,
by simp_rw [@inf_comm _ _ a, ←le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ←sup_le_iff]
instance : generalized_coheyting_algebra αᵒᵈ :=
{ sdiff := λ a b, to_dual (of_dual b ⇨ of_dual a),
sdiff_le_iff := λ a b c, by { rw sup_comm, exact le_himp_iff },
..order_dual.lattice α, ..order_dual.order_bot α }
instance prod.generalized_heyting_algebra [generalized_heyting_algebra β] :
generalized_heyting_algebra (α × β) :=
{ le_himp_iff := λ a b c, and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff,
..prod.lattice α β, ..prod.order_top α β, ..prod.has_himp, ..prod.has_compl }
instance pi.generalized_heyting_algebra {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, generalized_heyting_algebra (α i)] :
generalized_heyting_algebra (Π i, α i) :=
by { pi_instance, exact λ a b c, forall_congr (λ i, le_himp_iff) }
end generalized_heyting_algebra
section generalized_coheyting_algebra
variables [generalized_coheyting_algebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp] lemma sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
generalized_coheyting_algebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
lemma sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
lemma sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
lemma sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a := sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
lemma disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : disjoint a b) : disjoint (a \ c) b := h.mono_left sdiff_le
lemma disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : disjoint a b) : disjoint a (b \ c) := h.mono_right sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp] lemma sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ := le_bot_iff.1 $ sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
lemma le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b := sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
lemma le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ←sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp] lemma sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a := sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b := inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp] lemma sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a :=
by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sdiff_sup_self ← sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self ← sup_sdiff_self_right
lemma sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) $ le_sup_sdiff.trans $ sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `set.union_diff_cancel'`
lemma sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c :=
by rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
lemma sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b := sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
lemma sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
lemma sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac $ h.trans sdiff_le
lemma sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [←le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp] lemma sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a := eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ b, by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp] lemma bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ := sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
@[simp] lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : a \ b \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b :=
begin
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm],
exact le_sup_left,
end
lemma sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : a \ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d, by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
lemma sdiff_sdiff_left : a \ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) := sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
lemma sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : a \ b \ c = a \ c \ b := by simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
lemma sdiff_sdiff_comm : a \ b \ c = a \ c \ b := sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sdiff_idem : a \ b \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp] lemma sdiff_sdiff_self : a \ b \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
lemma sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d, by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
lemma sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d, by { rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff], simp_rw sdiff_le_comm }
lemma sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c := sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b :=
by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp] lemma sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
lemma sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := sdiff_le_iff.2 $ h.trans $ le_sup_sdiff
lemma sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 $ le_sup_sdiff.trans $ sup_le_sup_right h _
lemma sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans $ sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `is_compl.inf_sup`
lemma sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c := sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b :=
by rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp] lemma sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a :=
by rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
lemma disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : disjoint a b) : a \ b = a :=
by { conv_rhs { rw ←@sdiff_bot _ _ a }, rw [←h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left] }
lemma disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : disjoint a b) : b \ a = b := h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
lemma disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b :=
by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
lemma disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a :=
by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
lemma disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans $ sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
lemma sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b := sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
lemma sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c :=
by { rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ←sdiff_le_iff], exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff }
lemma sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' $ sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
lemma sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
by { rw [←sup_sdiff_left_self, ←@sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b], exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h }
lemma sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
by { rw [←sup_sdiff_right_self, ←@sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b], exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h }
@[simp] lemma inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left $ sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp] lemma inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left $ sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice : distrib_lattice α :=
{ le_sup_inf := λ a b c, by simp_rw [←sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ←le_inf_iff],
..‹generalized_coheyting_algebra α› }
instance : generalized_heyting_algebra αᵒᵈ :=
{ himp := λ a b, to_dual (of_dual b \ of_dual a),
le_himp_iff := λ a b c, by { rw inf_comm, exact sdiff_le_iff },
..order_dual.lattice α, ..order_dual.order_top α }
instance prod.generalized_coheyting_algebra [generalized_coheyting_algebra β] :
generalized_coheyting_algebra (α × β) :=
{ sdiff_le_iff := λ a b c, and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff,
..prod.lattice α β, ..prod.order_bot α β, ..prod.has_sdiff, ..prod.has_hnot }
instance pi.generalized_coheyting_algebra {α : ι → Type*}
[Π i, generalized_coheyting_algebra (α i)] : generalized_coheyting_algebra (Π i, α i) :=
by { pi_instance, exact λ a b c, forall_congr (λ i, sdiff_le_iff) }
end generalized_coheyting_algebra
section heyting_algebra
variables [heyting_algebra α] {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ := heyting_algebra.himp_bot _
@[simp] lemma bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ := himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
lemma compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by simp_rw [←himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
@[simp] lemma compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := compl_sup_distrib _ _
lemma compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b := (himp_bot _).ge.trans $ himp_le_himp_left bot_le
lemma compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b := sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
lemma sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b := sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp] lemma himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [←himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
lemma himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [←himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
lemma le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ disjoint a b :=
by rw [←himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
lemma le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint.comm
lemma le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ :=
by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
alias le_compl_iff_disjoint_right ↔ _ disjoint.le_compl_right
alias le_compl_iff_disjoint_left ↔ _ disjoint.le_compl_left
alias le_compl_comm ← le_compl_iff_le_compl
alias le_compl_comm ↔ le_compl_of_le_compl _
lemma disjoint_compl_left : disjoint aᶜ a := disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr $ le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
lemma disjoint_compl_right : disjoint a aᶜ := disjoint_compl_left.symm
lemma has_le.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : disjoint aᶜ b := disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
lemma has_le.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : disjoint a bᶜ := disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
lemma is_compl.compl_eq (h : is_compl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' $ disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
lemma is_compl.eq_compl (h : is_compl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm $ disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
lemma compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b := (is_compl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
@[simp] lemma inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ := disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
@[simp] lemma compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ := disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
lemma inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ := inf_compl_self _
lemma compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ := compl_inf_self _
@[simp] lemma compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ a, by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
@[simp] lemma compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [←himp_bot, himp_self]
lemma le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ := disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
lemma compl_anti : antitone (compl : α → α) := λ a b h, le_compl_comm.1 $ h.trans le_compl_compl
lemma compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ := compl_anti h
@[simp] lemma compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
@[simp] lemma disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ disjoint a b :=
by simp_rw [←le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
@[simp] lemma disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ disjoint a b :=
by simp_rw [←le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
lemma compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) $ compl_anti inf_le_right
lemma compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ :=
begin
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm _,
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ←disjoint_assoc, inf_comm],
exact disjoint_compl_right,
end
lemma compl_compl_himp_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⇨ bᶜᶜ :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ rw [le_himp_iff, ←compl_compl_inf_distrib],
exact compl_anti (compl_anti himp_inf_le) },
{ refine le_compl_comm.1 ((compl_anti compl_sup_le_himp).trans _),
rw [compl_sup_distrib, le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_right_comm,
←le_compl_iff_disjoint_right],
exact inf_himp_le }
end
instance : coheyting_algebra αᵒᵈ :=
{ hnot := to_dual ∘ compl ∘ of_dual,
sdiff := λ a b, to_dual (of_dual b ⇨ of_dual a),
sdiff_le_iff := λ a b c, by { rw sup_comm, exact le_himp_iff },
top_sdiff := himp_bot,
..order_dual.lattice α, ..order_dual.bounded_order α }
@[simp] lemma of_dual_hnot (a : αᵒᵈ) : of_dual ¬a = (of_dual a)ᶜ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_dual_compl (a : α) : to_dual aᶜ = ¬to_dual a := rfl
instance prod.heyting_algebra [heyting_algebra β] : heyting_algebra (α × β) :=
{ himp_bot := λ a, prod.ext (himp_bot a.1) (himp_bot a.2),
..prod.generalized_heyting_algebra, ..prod.bounded_order α β, ..prod.has_compl }
instance pi.heyting_algebra {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, heyting_algebra (α i)] :
heyting_algebra (Π i, α i) :=
by { pi_instance, exact λ a b c, forall_congr (λ i, le_himp_iff) }
end heyting_algebra
section coheyting_algebra
variables [coheyting_algebra α] {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma top_sdiff' (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ¬a := coheyting_algebra.top_sdiff _
@[simp] lemma sdiff_top (a : α) : a \ ⊤ = ⊥ := sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 le_top
lemma hnot_inf_distrib (a b : α) : ¬ (a ⊓ b) = ¬a ⊔ ¬b :=
by simp_rw [←top_sdiff', sdiff_inf_distrib]
lemma sdiff_le_hnot : a \ b ≤ ¬b := (sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_top).trans_eq $ top_sdiff' _
lemma sdiff_le_inf_hnot : a \ b ≤ a ⊓ ¬b := le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le_hnot
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance coheyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice : distrib_lattice α :=
{ le_sup_inf := λ a b c, by simp_rw [←sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ←le_inf_iff],
..‹coheyting_algebra α› }
@[simp] lemma hnot_sdiff (a : α) : ¬a \ a = ¬a := by rw [←top_sdiff', sdiff_sdiff, sup_idem]
lemma hnot_sdiff_comm (a b : α) : ¬a \ b = ¬b \ a := by simp_rw [←top_sdiff', sdiff_right_comm]
lemma hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right : ¬a ≤ b ↔ codisjoint a b :=
by rw [←top_sdiff', sdiff_le_iff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
lemma hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left : ¬a ≤ b ↔ codisjoint b a :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.trans codisjoint.comm
lemma hnot_le_comm : ¬a ≤ b ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
by rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left]
alias hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right ↔ _ codisjoint.hnot_le_right
alias hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left ↔ _ codisjoint.hnot_le_left
lemma codisjoint_hnot_right : codisjoint a (¬a) :=
codisjoint_iff_le_sup.2 $ sdiff_le_iff.1 (top_sdiff' _).le
lemma codisjoint_hnot_left : codisjoint (¬a) a := codisjoint_hnot_right.symm
lemma has_le.le.codisjoint_hnot_left (h : a ≤ b) : codisjoint (¬a) b :=
codisjoint_hnot_left.mono_right h
lemma has_le.le.codisjoint_hnot_right (h : b ≤ a) : codisjoint a (¬b) :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.mono_left h
lemma is_compl.hnot_eq (h : is_compl a b) : ¬a = b :=
h.2.hnot_le_right.antisymm $ disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1.symm codisjoint_hnot_right
lemma is_compl.eq_hnot (h : is_compl a b) : a = ¬b :=
h.2.hnot_le_left.antisymm' $ disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1 codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp] lemma sup_hnot_self (a : α) : a ⊔ ¬a = ⊤ := codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp] lemma hnot_sup_self (a : α) : ¬a ⊔ a = ⊤ := codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp] lemma hnot_bot : ¬(⊥ : α) = ⊤ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ a, by rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_bot, top_le_iff]
@[simp] lemma hnot_top : ¬(⊤ : α) = ⊥ := by rw [←top_sdiff', sdiff_self]
lemma hnot_hnot_le : ¬¬a ≤ a := codisjoint_hnot_right.hnot_le_left
lemma hnot_anti : antitone (hnot : α → α) := λ a b h, hnot_le_comm.1 $ hnot_hnot_le.trans h
lemma hnot_le_hnot (h : a ≤ b) : ¬b ≤ ¬a := hnot_anti h
@[simp] lemma hnot_hnot_hnot (a : α) : ¬¬¬a = ¬a := hnot_hnot_le.antisymm $ hnot_anti hnot_hnot_le
@[simp] lemma codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff : codisjoint (¬¬a) b ↔ codisjoint a b :=
by simp_rw [←hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_hnot_hnot]
@[simp] lemma codisjoint_hnot_hnot_right_iff : codisjoint a (¬¬b) ↔ codisjoint a b :=
by simp_rw [←hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, hnot_hnot_hnot]
lemma le_hnot_inf_hnot : ¬ (a ⊔ b) ≤ ¬a ⊓ ¬b :=
le_inf (hnot_anti le_sup_left) $ hnot_anti le_sup_right
lemma hnot_hnot_sup_distrib (a b : α) : ¬¬(a ⊔ b) = ¬¬a ⊔ ¬¬b :=
begin
refine ((hnot_inf_distrib _ _).ge.trans $ hnot_anti le_hnot_inf_hnot).antisymm' _,
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_assoc, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff,
codisjoint_left_comm, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff, ←codisjoint_assoc, sup_comm],
exact codisjoint_hnot_right,
end
lemma hnot_hnot_sdiff_distrib (a b : α) : ¬¬(a \ b) = ¬¬a \ ¬¬b :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ refine hnot_le_comm.1 ((hnot_anti sdiff_le_inf_hnot).trans' _),
rw [hnot_inf_distrib, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, codisjoint_left_comm,
←hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right],
exact le_sdiff_sup },
{ rw [sdiff_le_iff, ←hnot_hnot_sup_distrib],
exact hnot_anti (hnot_anti le_sup_sdiff) }
end
instance : heyting_algebra αᵒᵈ :=
{ compl := to_dual ∘ hnot ∘ of_dual,
himp := λ a b, to_dual (of_dual b \ of_dual a),
le_himp_iff := λ a b c, by { rw inf_comm, exact sdiff_le_iff },
himp_bot := top_sdiff',
..order_dual.lattice α, ..order_dual.bounded_order α }
@[simp] lemma of_dual_compl (a : αᵒᵈ) : of_dual aᶜ = ¬of_dual a := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_dual_himp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : of_dual (a ⇨ b) = of_dual b \ of_dual a := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_dual_hnot (a : α) : to_dual ¬a = (to_dual a)ᶜ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_dual_sdiff (a b : α) : to_dual (a \ b) = to_dual b ⇨ to_dual a := rfl
instance prod.coheyting_algebra [coheyting_algebra β] : coheyting_algebra (α × β) :=
{ sdiff_le_iff := λ a b c, and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := λ a, prod.ext (top_sdiff' a.1) (top_sdiff' a.2),
..prod.lattice α β, ..prod.bounded_order α β, ..prod.has_sdiff, ..prod.has_hnot }
instance pi.coheyting_algebra {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, coheyting_algebra (α i)] :
coheyting_algebra (Π i, α i) :=
by { pi_instance, exact λ a b c, forall_congr (λ i, sdiff_le_iff) }
end coheyting_algebra
section biheyting_algebra
variables [biheyting_algebra α] {a : α}
lemma compl_le_hnot : aᶜ ≤ ¬a :=
(disjoint_compl_left : disjoint _ a).le_of_codisjoint codisjoint_hnot_right
end biheyting_algebra
/-- Propositions form a Heyting algebra with implication as Heyting implication and negation as
complement. -/
instance Prop.heyting_algebra : heyting_algebra Prop :=
{ himp := (→),
le_himp_iff := λ p q r, and_imp.symm,
himp_bot := λ p, rfl,
..Prop.has_compl, ..Prop.distrib_lattice, ..Prop.bounded_order }
@[simp] lemma himp_iff_imp (p q : Prop) : p ⇨ q ↔ p → q := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma compl_iff_not (p : Prop) : pᶜ ↔ ¬ p := iff.rfl
/-- A bounded linear order is a bi-Heyting algebra by setting
* `a ⇨ b = ⊤` if `a ≤ b` and `a ⇨ b = b` otherwise.
* `a \ b = ⊥` if `a ≤ b` and `a \ b = a` otherwise. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def linear_order.to_biheyting_algebra [linear_order α] [bounded_order α] : biheyting_algebra α :=
{ himp := λ a b, if a ≤ b then ⊤ else b,
compl := λ a, if a = ⊥ then ⊤ else ⊥,
le_himp_iff := λ a b c, begin
change _ ≤ ite _ _ _ ↔ _,
split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_true le_top (inf_le_of_right_le h) },
{ rw [inf_le_iff, or_iff_left h] }
end,
himp_bot := λ a, if_congr le_bot_iff rfl rfl,
sdiff := λ a b, if a ≤ b then ⊥ else a,
hnot := λ a, if a = ⊤ then ⊥ else ⊤,
sdiff_le_iff := λ a b c, begin
change ite _ _ _ ≤ _ ↔ _,
split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_true bot_le (le_sup_of_le_left h) },
{ rw [le_sup_iff, or_iff_right h] }
end,
top_sdiff := λ a, if_congr top_le_iff rfl rfl,
..linear_order.to_lattice, ..‹bounded_order α› }
section lift
/-- Pullback a `generalized_heyting_algebra` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.generalized_heyting_algebra [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_top α]
[has_himp α] [generalized_heyting_algebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) :
generalized_heyting_algebra α :=
{ le_top := λ a, by { change f _ ≤ _, rw map_top, exact le_top },
le_himp_iff := λ a b c, by { change f _ ≤ _ ↔ f _ ≤ _, erw [map_himp, map_inf, le_himp_iff] },
..hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf, ..‹has_top α›, ..‹has_himp α› }
/-- Pullback a `generalized_coheyting_algebra` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.generalized_coheyting_algebra [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_bot α]
[has_sdiff α] [generalized_coheyting_algebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
generalized_coheyting_algebra α :=
{ bot_le := λ a, by { change f _ ≤ _, rw map_bot, exact bot_le },
sdiff_le_iff := λ a b c, by { change f _ ≤ _ ↔ f _ ≤ _, erw [map_sdiff, map_sup, sdiff_le_iff] },
..hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf, ..‹has_bot α›, ..‹has_sdiff α› }
/-- Pullback a `heyting_algebra` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.heyting_algebra [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_top α] [has_bot α]
[has_compl α] [has_himp α] [heyting_algebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_compl : ∀ a, f aᶜ = (f a)ᶜ)
(map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) :
heyting_algebra α :=
{ bot_le := λ a, by { change f _ ≤ _, rw map_bot, exact bot_le },
himp_bot := λ a, hf $ by erw [map_himp, map_compl, map_bot, himp_bot],
..hf.generalized_heyting_algebra f map_sup map_inf map_top map_himp,
..‹has_bot α›, ..‹has_compl α› }
/-- Pullback a `coheyting_algebra` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.coheyting_algebra [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_top α] [has_bot α]
[has_hnot α] [has_sdiff α] [coheyting_algebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_hnot : ∀ a, f ¬a = ¬f a)
(map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
coheyting_algebra α :=
{ le_top := λ a, by { change f _ ≤ _, rw map_top, exact le_top },
top_sdiff := λ a, hf $ by erw [map_sdiff, map_hnot, map_top, top_sdiff'],
..hf.generalized_coheyting_algebra f map_sup map_inf map_bot map_sdiff,
..‹has_top α›, ..‹has_hnot α› }
/-- Pullback a `biheyting_algebra` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.biheyting_algebra [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_top α] [has_bot α]
[has_compl α] [has_hnot α] [has_himp α] [has_sdiff α] [biheyting_algebra β] (f : α → β)
(hf : injective f) (map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b)
(map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥)
(map_compl : ∀ a, f aᶜ = (f a)ᶜ) (map_hnot : ∀ a, f ¬a = ¬f a)
(map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
biheyting_algebra α :=
{ ..hf.heyting_algebra f map_sup map_inf map_top map_bot map_compl map_himp,
..hf.coheyting_algebra f map_sup map_inf map_top map_bot map_hnot map_sdiff }
end lift
namespace punit
variables (a b : punit.{u+1})
instance : biheyting_algebra punit :=
by refine_struct
{ top := star,
bot := star,
sup := λ _ _, star,
inf := λ _ _, star,
compl := λ _, star,
sdiff := λ _ _, star,
hnot := λ _, star,
himp := λ _ _, star, ..punit.linear_order };
intros; trivial <|> exact subsingleton.elim _ _
@[simp] lemma top_eq : (⊤ : punit) = star := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_eq : (⊥ : punit) = star := rfl
@[simp] lemma sup_eq : a ⊔ b = star := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_eq : a ⊓ b = star := rfl
@[simp] lemma compl_eq : aᶜ = star := rfl
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq : a \ b = star := rfl
@[simp, nolint simp_nf] lemma hnot_eq : ¬a = star := rfl -- eligible for `dsimp`
@[simp] lemma himp_eq : a ⇨ b = star := rfl
end punit