Skip to content

ETL Improvements and other issues fixes - #1647

Merged
lossyrob merged 6 commits into
locationtech:masterfrom
pomadchin:feature/etl-improvements
Oct 5, 2016
Merged

lossyrob merged 6 commits into
locationtech:masterfrom
pomadchin:feature/etl-improvements

Conversation

@pomadchin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@RickMohr and @lossyrob what do you think about clipping by extent?

@RickMohr

RickMohr commented Oct 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

If clipping by extent and also transforming coordinates, should the clipping frame be specified in the source or target coordinate system? I think it would be more useful in the target coordinate system. In either case some doc would be important to avoid confusion.

@pomadchin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@RickMohr in the current implementation - the source coordinate system; though I agree with you, let's make it in target coordinate system and need to update docs, thanks!

@RickMohr

RickMohr commented Oct 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Clipping looks good, thanks!

@pomadchin pomadchin changed the title ETL Improvements ETL Improvements and other issues fixes Oct 4, 2016
@lossyrob

lossyrob commented Oct 5, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pomadchin if you just say in the PR body

"Fixes #XXX"

then it automatically closes them on merge and then I don't have to do it manually ;)

@lossyrob
lossyrob merged commit ecde956 into locationtech:master Oct 5, 2016
@pomadchin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

:0 sorry for that @lossyrob

@lossyrob lossyrob added this to the 1.0 milestone Oct 18, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants