Skip to content

Remove ETL - #2969

Merged
jbouffard merged 4 commits into
locationtech:feature/collections-split-rebasedfrom
moradology:feature/drop-etl
Jun 6, 2019
Merged

jbouffard merged 4 commits into
locationtech:feature/collections-split-rebasedfrom
moradology:feature/drop-etl

Conversation

@moradology

@moradology moradology commented Jun 5, 2019 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overview

This PR has 3 objectives:

  1. 🔥 the ETL project;
  2. Banish it to https://github.com/geotrellis/etl
  3. Document an alternative path to ingests

Checklist

  • docs/CHANGELOG.rst updated, if necessary
  • docs guides update, if necessary

Closes #2959

@moradology
moradology requested a review from jbouffard June 5, 2019 20:45
@moradology

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jbouffard I've gone ahead and rebased on top of the spark split; we can switch the target branch to master once you've rebased off it and merged things in

@moradology moradology changed the title [WIP] - Remove ETL Remove ETL Jun 5, 2019

@jbouffard jbouffard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. The only thing I saw was a few typos. The tests are failing for unrelated reasons, so this can be merged once those are fixed.

Comment thread docs/guide/pipeline.rst Outdated
Comment thread docs/guide/ingests.rst Outdated
@jbouffard jbouffard mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2019

@pomadchin pomadchin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The updated doc is not a part of the index.rst, can you add it here?

Scripts in .locationtech, scripts and publish are not updated according to the changes.

@moradology

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jbouffard
jbouffard merged commit 481ad92 into locationtech:feature/collections-split-rebased Jun 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants