Skip to content

Low Pass filter: different results in versions 0.5.0 and 0.6.0 #15

Open

Description

@h28669

I have upgraded our project from Math.Net.Filtering 0.5.0 to 0.6.0 Now I get completely different results with LowPass filter.

Example
var frequency = 1d / 360d;
var samplingFrequency = 0.1; // Nyquist: sampling rate must be at least double the frequency
var amplitude = 1;
var seriesLength = 10;
var input = Generate.Sinusoidal(seriesLength, samplingFrequency, frequency, amplitude);
var filter = new LowPassFilter();

Result with 0.5.0 {0, 0.032, 0.203, 0.4, 0.584, 0.751, 0.895, 1.012, 1.098, 1.151};
Result with 0.6.0 {0, -0.003, -0.004, -0.005, -0.008, -0.007, -0.01, -0.009, -0.009, -0.012}

Which one is correct? Do I need to change something when setting up filter?

Within my wrapper class "LowPassFilter" the filter is created as follows:
The values used are: filter.CutOffFrequency = 0.04; filter.OrderOfFilter = 2;

protected override OnlineFilter CreateFilter() {
return OnlineFilter.CreateLowpass(ImpulseResponse.Finite, SamplingFrequency, CutOffFrequency.Value, OrderOfFilter);
}

Thanks for help
Gianni

Activity

  1. SOCMarcel commented on Jun 12, 2020

    @SOCMarcel

    Hello,

    as far as I unterstand the source code (https://github.com/mathnet/mathnet-filtering/blob/master/src/Filtering/OnlineFilter.cs, https://github.com/mathnet/mathnet-filtering/blob/master/src/Filtering/FIR/FirCoefficients.cs) there seems to be an issue with CreateLowpass(ImpulseResponse mode, double sampleRate, double cutoffRate, int order):

    In case of passed mode ImpulseResponse.Finite the following code is executed:
    double[] c = FirCoefficients.LowPass(sampleRate, cutoffRate, order >> 1);
    return new OnlineFirFilter(c);
    Yet as you can see in the history (probably corresponding to version change from 0.5 to 0.6) the signature of FirCoefficients.LowPass(...) changed from
    public static double[] LowPass(double samplingRate, double cutoff, int halforder = 0)
    to
    public static double[] LowPass(double samplingRate, double cutoff, double dcGain = 1.0, int halforder = 0)

    So from my point of view the order parameter from CreateLowpass(...) gets now passed as dcGain to FirCoefficients.LowPass(...) instead of halforder which results in incorrect coefficients.

    Kind regards.
    Marcel

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions