Skip to content

Improve stdio transport validation and function naming - #365

Merged
domdomegg merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
adamj/improve-stdio-transport-validation
Sep 5, 2025
Merged

domdomegg merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
adamj/improve-stdio-transport-validation

Conversation

@domdomegg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Add validation that URL must be empty for stdio transport types
  • Rename validateTransport to validateRemoteTransport for better clarity
  • Update corresponding test case to expect error when stdio transport has URL

Context

This addresses two specific feedback comments from @domdomegg on PR #345:

  1. "do we want to validate the the url is empty?" - Now validates URL is empty for stdio
  2. "maybe rename validateRemoteTransport or something?" - Renamed function for clarity

The changes enforce stricter validation while improving code readability through better naming.

- Add validation that URL must be empty for stdio transport types
- Rename validateTransport to validateRemoteTransport for clarity
- Update test case to expect error when stdio transport has URL

This addresses feedback from PR #345 requesting stricter validation
for stdio transports and better function naming.

:house: Remote-Dev: homespace
@domdomegg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Requesting review from @rdimitrov

@domdomegg
domdomegg merged commit e9884c1 into main Sep 5, 2025
6 checks passed
@domdomegg
domdomegg deleted the adamj/improve-stdio-transport-validation branch September 5, 2025 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants