Skip to content

»All apps« category in apps management #126

Description

@jancborchardt

It has always been confusing that to enable a new app, you need to switch the category. In other apps like Files, Contacts etc there is always some kind of »Everything/All« default view (All files, All contacts etc) to see everything.

Hence for apps, we should have an entry »All apps« on the top of the sidebar which includes both Enabled and Disabled apps.

Enabled apps should be sorted first, then below that disabled apps. (And then the entries »Enabled apps / Disabled apps could simply act as anchors of that view.)

cc @LukasReschke and FYI @BernhardPosselt @hannob

Activity

  1. added this to the milestone on Jun 16, 2016
  2. added
    papercutAnnoying recurring UX issue with possibly simple fix.
    on Aug 3, 2016
  3. blizzz commented on Aug 18, 2016

    @blizzz
    Member

    Too late for 10, moving to 11.

  4. LukasReschke commented on Aug 18, 2016

    @LukasReschke
    Member

    Also would be easier with the new appstore.

  5. jancborchardt commented on Sep 26, 2016

    @jancborchardt
    MemberAuthor

    cc @BernhardPosselt @janibonnevier @adsworth regarding the new appstore. :) We really need this category for a nicer UX and simpler flow.

  6. BernhardPosselt commented on Sep 26, 2016

    @BernhardPosselt
    Member

    Already possible, fully depends on you guys ;)

  7. MorrisJobke commented on Nov 23, 2016

    @MorrisJobke
    Member

    Too much change involved to get this in -> 12

  8. jancborchardt commented on Apr 12, 2017

    @jancborchardt
    MemberAuthor

    This will be fixed by @eppfel’s »Make apps settings tabular«: #3195 – so please help reviewing. :)

  9. MorrisJobke commented on Apr 12, 2017

    @MorrisJobke
    Member

    This will be fixed by @eppfel’s »Make apps settings tabular«: #3195 – so please help reviewing. :)

    It's not ready for reviewing - please fix it first: #3195 (comment)

  10. jancborchardt commented on Apr 25, 2017

    @jancborchardt
    MemberAuthor

    Merged and fixed with #3195 :)

  11. MorrisJobke commented on Apr 9, 2018

    @MorrisJobke
    Member

    Also related to #6868

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions