Skip to content

Implement Optional[T] as an alias for Union[T, None] #477

Closed

Description

@JukkaL

In preparation for strict checking of None values, Optional[T] should be an alias for Union[T, None] (for arbitrary T).

There are at least two valid ways to implement this:

  1. Special case Optional[T] in the semantic analyzer.
  2. Support generic type aliases of form Optional = Union[T, None], and use this to define Optional.

In the latter case, the fact that Optional takes a type argument would be inferred from the right hand side -- I assume that T is a free (unbound) type variable, so it is inferred as an argument of the left hand side. The second case is also complicated by the fact that the result of Union[...] should support indexing.

The first approach is okay as well, even though eventually we might want generic type aliases.

In either case, the typing module must be modified as well so that Optional can be used at runtime.

Activity

  1. JukkaL commented on Feb 8, 2015

    @JukkaL
    CollaboratorAuthor

    As we currently don't have precise type checking of None values, Optional[t] would be an alias for t. That is, it's mostly for documentation for now -- and to make it easier to switch to better None type checking in the (hopefully near) future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions