You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Feature Request: Type hint for Fixed Length Homogeneous Sequences #786
A concise way to hint that a sequence of homogenous types is a set length. i.e The items in the sequence are all of the same type, the sequence is iterable, and cannot grow larger or smaller.
Pitch
Currently, the recommended way to add type hints to fixed-length sequences is to use Tuples 1. i.e
Although the name Tuple does not signal intent very well. The real thing that we are trying to signal is that this is a sequence of floats of length 10. It does not necessarily have to be a Tuple, it just has to be iterable, and have 10 items, that cannot grow larger or smaller. If I wanted to pass the function a List, this should also pass static type checkers, as long as it has 10 floats.
Possible Implementation
I am not a core python developer, I have never even looked at the implementation of the typing module, and I'm not even that good of a python developer, so please forgive me if this is nonsense.
In Python 3.10 or newer [2] we will be able to use the unpack operator in subscript. So we might be able to do something like:
_t=[float]*10deffoo(ten_floats: Tuple[*_t]):
...
Using TypeVars, we could generalize this function to accept 10 of any type (as long as they are all the same type)
error: Variable "test.EightTuple" is not valid as a type [valid-type]
(mypy 1.4.1)
This was two years a go, so I don't remember exactly how deep I got with this. I seem to recall only playing around with GenericAlias, but not validating the resulting type in mypy. It would be nice for these to validate though. I suspect the issue is that the code has to execute, and mypy only looks at static code, but I'm not 100% sure on that.
A thought on syntax: I just stumbled on the similar foo: tuple[int, int, int] problem, and my naive/intuitive guess was foo: tuple[int]*3 or foo: tuple[int*3], based on the familiar (7,)*3 syntax.
Given that T1 | T2 | ... | Tn is now valid syntax for union types, I think the natural extension for product types (i.e., tuples) would be T1 & T2 & ... & Tn. For very long homogeneous tuples, I'd say either (T,) * n or T ** n would make sense.
This doesn't work for me. This code does not issue a typing warning:
fromtypesimportGenericAliasfromtypingimportTypeVarT=TypeVar('T')
Pair=GenericAlias(tuple, (T,)*2)
deffoo(a: Pair[int]) ->None:
print(a[0])
foo((1, 3, 3))
# Expected a typing warning ("Expected type 'tuple[int, int]', got 'tuple[int, int, int]' instead"), but did not get one.# Changing the type hint of `a` in `foo` to 'tuple[int, int]' does issue this warning, as expected.
I'm using Python 3.10, mypy==1.11.2, PyCharm community 2024.2.
Activity
jp-larose commentedon May 5, 2021
Experimenting with this idea, I found a possible solution using the existing API.
Summary
Create type-hint for a fixed-length homogeneous tuple directly with
types.GenericAlias.How I got there
At first, I tried manipulating
tuples directly:However, I got stuck at this point because:
I tried other variations on this theme with
typing.Generic, and kept getting the same error.I also made a desperate attempt at a tuple metatype, but that failed miserably.
Then I looked at
Which got me thinking, maybe we can just create our own alias type directly:
garrison commentedon Jan 24, 2023
In Julia, this type alias is called
NTuple:Ricyteach commentedon Jul 5, 2023
Did something change? I am getting:
(mypy 1.4.1)
jp-larose commentedon Jul 11, 2023
This was two years a go, so I don't remember exactly how deep I got with this. I seem to recall only playing around with
GenericAlias, but not validating the resulting type in mypy. It would be nice for these to validate though. I suspect the issue is that the code has to execute, and mypy only looks at static code, but I'm not 100% sure on that.jacktose commentedon Jan 10, 2024
A thought on syntax: I just stumbled on the similar
foo: tuple[int, int, int]problem, and my naive/intuitive guess wasfoo: tuple[int]*3orfoo: tuple[int*3], based on the familiar(7,)*3syntax.lou1306 commentedon Aug 23, 2024
Given that
T1 | T2 | ... | Tnis now valid syntax for union types, I think the natural extension for product types (i.e., tuples) would beT1 & T2 & ... & Tn. For very long homogeneous tuples, I'd say either(T,) * norT ** nwould make sense.Shaked-Q commentedon Aug 25, 2024
This doesn't work for me. This code does not issue a typing warning:
I'm using Python 3.10, mypy==1.11.2, PyCharm community 2024.2.