All issues

Search results

Why is syntax the preferred integration point?

Status: Open.

#248 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· idleman opened on Jun 6, 2026

Concerns on Syntax Erasure and the Long-term Runtime Potential of Type Annotations

Status: Open.

#247 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· Gokul-Gireesh opened on Mar 12, 2026

Why is this proposal blocked at stage 1?

Status: Open.

#246 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· flexiworld opened on Feb 20, 2026

Proposal: Strategy for Advancing Type Annotations to Stage 2: Engine Implementation and Tooling Contract

Status: Open.

#245 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· lemanschik opened on Nov 17, 2025

the market moves with or without ecmascript

Status: Open.

#244 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· ReinsBrain opened on Nov 14, 2025

Make it a browser option

Status: Open.

#242 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· NiedziolkaMichal opened on Sep 17, 2025

To use "use strict" to enable type annotations in strict mode

Status: Open.

#241 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· cers000 opened on Sep 15, 2025

Code snippets don't respect dark mode

Status: Open.

#240 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· JoshuaKGoldberg opened on Sep 1, 2025

Changes in README broke links on tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations

Status: Open.

#233 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· Download opened on Jun 13, 2025

Experimental forward compatible type-stripper

Status: Open.

#229 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· fcrozatier opened on Dec 26, 2024

Undocumented omissions (auto-accessors and satisfies keyword)

Status: Open.

#228 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· fcrozatier opened on Dec 26, 2024

Request for updated information

Status: Open.

#224 In tc39/proposal-type-annotations;

· SeanMcMillan opened on Sep 16, 2024