Every environmental workflow. One place to know what matters.

Knoy connects reports, spreadsheets, field records, requirements, decisions and reviews across your projects—so specialists spend less time searching and reconstructing context, and more time applying professional judgment.

Explore your workflow See how Knoy connects the work

Trace the original source: Return to the document, page, section and quote behind a working conclusion.
Keep judgment human: Specialists interpret, verify and approve. Knoy helps connect the manual trail.
Your documents, as they are: Work with PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV and TXT sources, with source references preserved.
Across the project lifecycle: Connect assessment, management and compliance. Broader lifecycle tracking is being designed.

Why Knoy

Environmental work runs on evidence. Yet the evidence is scattered across reports, spreadsheets, inboxes and project drives.

Follow the evidenceIllustrative project data

Choose a source to explore its evidence.

01
Searching page 247.
A 600-page EIS. Three superseded studies. An agency letter, field spreadsheet and marked-up plan. Your expertise should not be spent finding them again.
02
Reconstructing the trail.
Before: reopen PDFs, compare versions and ask who reviewed the conclusion. With Knoy: retrieve supplied project evidence and return to its original source.
03
Repeating the same work.
Before: copy findings between reports, registers and email. Knoy connects cited working outputs and reviews; wider change propagation is product direction.

Find, organise, retrieve, trace, compare and connect. Coordinate, draft, review, track, reuse and export—with professional judgment at the centre.

One connected lifecycle

From first field record to management and compliance.

Discover, scope, assess, review, deliver, manage, monitor, audit and learn. Six interactive examples show how the source travels with the work. Reporting is one stage, not the end.

See what the environmental work needs.

Bring requirements, risks, evidence gaps and specialist responsibilities into project context. Approvals sit alongside assessment, construction, management and compliance work.

Project requirements and evidence

Requirements matrix
	Requirement
R-018	Assess impacts on threatened species and ecological communities.Biodiversity	Covered	12
R-024	Describe erosion and sediment controls for each construction stage.Soils	Covered	7
R-042	Assess water quality impacts during construction and operation.Surface water	In review	6
R-063	Assess traffic and access impacts on the local road network.Traffic	Covered	5
R-077	Describe noise and vibration impacts on nearby receivers.Noise	Gap	0
R-102	Assess bushfire risk and asset protection zones.Hazards	In review	2

Requirements with evidence83%

Illustrative workflow with synthetic project data. Wider lifecycle capabilities are product direction.

Every source, anchored to the page.

Find supplied reports, field records, spreadsheets and correspondence. Source anchors keep document, page, section and quote context visible; exact row and record views vary by format.

Evidence

IndexedPDF · 132 pages

HYD-03 Surface water baselinePage 47 · 3.2 Turbidity

Turbidity exceeded the 50 NTU trigger value at SW2 and SW4 following rainfall events greater than 20 mm.

Quote hash 7f3a 9c1e

Illustrative workflow with synthetic project data. Wider lifecycle capabilities are product direction.

Drafts that cite as they go.

Prepare source-backed working sections, registers and responses. Identify possible evidence gaps and verify every statement; AI assistance is not professional advice or a finished assessment.

§ 8.4 Surface water · Draft

Chapter 8 · Surface water8.4 Water quality during construction

The access road crosses two ephemeral drainage lines that feed Wattle Creek.

Baseline monitoring recorded turbidity above the 50 NTU trigger after rainfall events greater than 20 mm.

Groundwater interaction is expected to be minor. Needs source

2 of 3 sentences cited

Hover or focus a citation to see its source.

Illustrative workflow with synthetic project data. Wider lifecycle capabilities are product direction.

Specialist review, with the source beside it.

Qualified specialists interpret, verify, accept, revise or reject with the source in view. Output review states exist; complete review-history coverage varies by workflow.

Review · § 8.4

Drafted, Completed
Specialist review
Approved, Not started

Step 2 of 3: Specialist review

§ 8.4 Water quality during construction

2 comments

Hydrology lead2h
The turbidity finding checks out against HYD-03 page 47. Can we add quarterly sampling at SW2 to the commitments?
- Project planner1h
  Added as C-027 and linked to R-042.

Illustrative workflow with synthetic project data. Wider lifecycle capabilities are product direction.

See what a change touches.

Keep owners, dependencies and decisions close to the source. Document-version comparison exists; the wider coordination dashboard, operational tracking and downstream change propagation are product direction.

Change impact · Agency letter 14

Today, 2 updates

North Coast Planning Office requested an updated drainage designAGL-143 hours ago, Wednesday, September 30 at 8:00 AM

Owners to notify

Surface water leadR-042 and section 8.4

Biodiversity leadR-018 and section 7.2

Civil designerCommitment C-027

Illustrative workflow with synthetic project data. Wider lifecycle capabilities are product direction.

Carry reviewed working material into delivery.

Export supported working outputs to Word, Excel, PDF or CSV. The generated-output route checks citations and approval; formats, review history and checks vary across other export paths.

Export · Review pack

Citations resolved100%

Specialist reviews approved88%

1 review still open

Illustrative workflow with synthetic project data. Wider lifecycle capabilities are product direction.

Discover — Find relevant project history, previous reports, conditions, methods and evidence.
Scope — Understand requirements, risks, information gaps, responsibilities and dependencies.
Assess — Connect field data, technical analysis, assumptions, models and specialist findings.
Review — Coordinate technical review, comments, decisions, approvals and outstanding issues.
Deliver — Prepare evidence-backed assessments, management plans, registers and responses.
Manage — Carry mitigation measures, commitments and conditions into construction and operation.
Monitor — Connect inspections, results, incidents and correspondence to obligations.
Audit and learn — Demonstrate compliance, verify action closure and preserve authorised knowledge.

Working outputs and shared knowledge

Useful outputs, across the life of a project.

Assessments, management plans, compliance records and project controls. Source-backed working material, with professional approval required. The full library is product direction.

Keep assumptions, specialist findings and source references beside each working section.
Working outputs
Connect each issue to the evidence, response owner and review decision behind it.
Working outputs
Carry reviewed measures into practical working plans, with responsibilities and source context.
Working outputs
Assemble evidence for professional assessment; a generated pack is not a compliance determination.
Working outputs
Keep the source, the current revision and the person responsible attached to the work.
Working outputs
Your old reports are valuable project knowledge, with their sources and permissions attached.
Product direction
One field record can support assessment, management and compliance without losing its context.
Connected evidence
Project management, with the evidence attached: owners, dependencies, reviews and affected work.
Product direction

Assessment

EIS and REF chapters
Specialist assessments
Constraints and gap analyses
Technical memoranda
Amendment reports

The full deliverable library is product direction. Source-backed working material still requires professional verification and approval.

Engagement and response

Response to submissions
Agency-response registers
Issues and commitments registers
Consultation summaries

The full deliverable library is product direction. Source-backed working material still requires professional verification and approval.

Management

CEMP and OEMP
Sub-plans
Erosion and sediment controls
Waste management plans
Biodiversity management plans
Monitoring programs

The full deliverable library is product direction. Source-backed working material still requires professional verification and approval.

Compliance

Conditions registers
Compliance reports
Audit working papers
Inspection records
Corrective-action registers
Incident reports
Annual environmental reports

The full deliverable library is product direction. Source-backed working material still requires professional verification and approval.

Project control

Evidence registers
Review packs
Decision logs
Information requests
Change-impact assessments
Deliverable trackers

The full deliverable library is product direction. Source-backed working material still requires professional verification and approval.

Organisational memory

Past reports, tested methodologies and survey approaches
Assessment assumptions and regulator feedback
Mitigation measures, monitoring programs and previous commitments
Lessons from delivery, review comments and decisions

Cross-project search and reuse are being designed. Knowledge must respect organisation, project and client access boundaries; reuse still requires verification in the new context.

One evidence chain

Source document or field record
Evidence
Specialist interpretation
Finding
Impact
Mitigation measure
Commitment
Approval condition
Monitoring result
Compliance evidence
Future project knowledge

Source anchors exist today. The full lifecycle relationship model and authorised historical reuse are product direction. Specialist interpretation and sign-off remain human.

Project coordination

Changed access alignment → water, ecology and landscape/visual reviewers → assessment and CEMP
Spoil-classification evidence gap → waste consultant → waste plan and contractor briefing
Monitoring-program review → environmental manager → water sub-plan and conditions register
Corrective-action closure → environmental auditor → working paper and compliance report

These are synthetic examples of the intended coordination dashboard. Project roles and output reviews exist; continuous operational tracking, monitoring dates and corrective-action management are not complete.

Mangrove channels braiding through a tidal estuary

The environment is interconnected. Environmental work should be too.

Across 18 environmental roles

Start with the work you do.

From BAM assessors and water specialists to environmental auditors and project leads. Open a discipline group to explore the manual work, how Knoy helps and what remains human.

Biodiversity and BAM, water, waste, contamination, heritage, and marine and coastal work.

Approvals and EIS, air quality, noise, social impact, climate, hazards and risk.

Management plans, construction, compliance, monitoring, auditing and multidisciplinary leadership.

Explore the work, the support Knoy is being built to provide, and the judgment that remains with you. Wider specialist workflows are product direction, not a promise that every capability is complete.

Environmental approvals / EIS

Keep the whole assessment consistent as specialist advice changes.

The manual work

Translate requirements across disciplines and identify evidence gaps.
Find the latest specialist conclusion and reconcile chapter versions.
Coordinate multidisciplinary review through scattered comments.
Update the EIS, response to submissions, amendments and commitments together.

How Knoy helps

Map requirements to evidence, owners and working sections.
Open the source behind a passage and surface missing support.
Identify possible change impacts across chapters and registers.
Keep specialist review and commitments attached to the assessment.

What remains human

Planning interpretation and strategic advice.
Impact evaluation and assessment of adequacy.
Resolution of conflicting specialist conclusions.
Final review, professional approval and submission.

Synthetic evidence connection
The revised water study needs review in both the assessment chapter and the monitoring commitments.
REQ-04 · clause 6.2

Connected working outputs

EIS / REF chapter
Response to submissions
Commitments register

Biodiversity / BAM

Keep ecological findings connected to the field evidence behind them.

The manual work

Recover survey methods and results across reports and spreadsheets.
Trace threatened-species findings to field records and survey effort.
Compare assessment revisions, impacts and mitigation measures.
Keep specialist findings aligned with the BDAR and EIS.

How Knoy helps

Connect ecology reports, field records, figures and findings.
Open the exact source behind a statement.
Compare revisions and flag sections that may need another review.
Reuse authorised context with citations and a visible review trail.

What remains human

Survey design and ecological interpretation.
BAM calculations and assessment of survey adequacy.
Impact assessment and mitigation recommendations.
Professional verification and sign-off.

Synthetic evidence connection
A habitat observation is linked to the survey record; its significance still needs the ecologist’s interpretation.
ECO-07 · field sheet 18

Connected working outputs

BDAR working material
Biodiversity management plan
EIS biodiversity chapter

Water and flooding

Follow a changed water assumption into the work that depends on it.

The manual work

Reconcile surface-water and groundwater sampling with laboratory tables.
Find the model version, rainfall inputs and assumptions behind a result.
Compare flood extents and drainage-design revisions.
Carry reviewed findings into assessment, controls and monitoring plans.

How Knoy helps

Link samples, source tables, model notes and specialist reports.
Trace a stated result to its cited source and version.
Show which draft sections and commitments use a changed assumption.
Coordinate hydrology, design and environmental review.

What remains human

Sampling design, calibration and model selection.
Hydrological and hydrogeological interpretation.
Flood-risk assessment and uncertainty analysis.
Design recommendations and technical sign-off.

Synthetic evidence connection
A revised sampling location affects the water chapter, drainage review and construction monitoring plan.
HYD-03 · page 47 · table 8

Connected working outputs

Water assessment
Flooding memorandum
Monitoring program

Air quality and odour

Keep emissions, assumptions and sensitive receivers in the same trail.

The manual work

Reconcile emission inventories with process and activity data.
Recover meteorological inputs and dispersion-model assumptions.
Check receptor lists across air, odour and greenhouse assessments.
Update findings when operating scenarios or control measures change.

How Knoy helps

Connect inventory tables, scenario notes and assessment passages.
Trace quantities and factors to the supplied references.
Compare source revisions and identify possibly affected conclusions.
Keep review comments linked to controls and monitoring commitments.

What remains human

Emission-factor selection and data validation.
Dispersion modelling and odour assessment.
Evaluation against applicable criteria and uncertainty.
Control recommendations and specialist approval.

Synthetic evidence connection
The changed operating hours are flagged against the emissions inventory and draft management controls.
AIR-02 · page 31 · scenario B

Connected working outputs

Air and odour assessment
Greenhouse assessment
Air-quality management plan

Noise and vibration

Keep the receiver, scenario and recommended control together.

The manual work

Recover logger locations, monitoring periods and background levels.
Match equipment schedules to acoustic-model scenarios.
Reconcile receiver IDs across drawings and specialist reports.
Revise construction controls after staging or plant changes.

How Knoy helps

Connect monitoring records, source tables and assessment findings.
Trace receiver-specific statements to their source scenario.
Compare revisions and flag affected controls and deliverables.
Route unresolved assumptions to the acoustic reviewer.

What remains human

Measurement design and acoustic modelling.
Interpretation of noise and vibration criteria.
Impact assessment and selection of practical mitigation.
Specialist verification and approval.

Synthetic evidence connection
A revised night-work scenario needs acoustic review before its controls are carried into the CEMP.
NV-04 · page 22 · receiver R3

Connected working outputs

Noise and vibration assessment
Construction sub-plan
Monitoring report

Waste and resources

Keep waste quantities and classifications traceable as plans evolve.

The manual work

Consolidate waste streams and quantities across schedules.
Check classifications against sampling and source documents.
Reconcile contractor and receiving-facility information.
Update waste plans, commitments, calculations and references.

How Knoy helps

Structure source material and connect related schedules.
Trace quantities and proposed classifications to their references.
Compare revisions and find statements without supporting evidence.
Carry reviewed evidence into working plans and reports.

What remains human

Classification decisions and sampling interpretation.
Regulatory assessment and facility suitability checks.
Resource-recovery and management recommendations.
Approval of the final deliverable.

Synthetic evidence connection
The revised spoil quantity is connected to the waste plan; classification remains pending specialist review.
WST-02 · sheet Streams · row 24

Connected working outputs

Waste management plan
Resource-recovery assessment
Waste tracking register

Contamination and soils

Maintain the trail from sample and laboratory result to recommendation.

The manual work

Reconcile borehole logs, sample IDs, chain-of-custody and laboratory tables.
Recover the assumptions behind the conceptual site model.
Compare investigation revisions and unresolved data gaps.
Update remediation and validation material as new results arrive.

How Knoy helps

Connect logs, analytical records and the statements they support.
Surface missing references and inconsistent source versions.
Trace changed results to affected findings and draft plans.
Keep evidence requests and specialist review decisions together.

What remains human

Investigation design and data-quality assessment.
Interpretation of contamination, soils and exposure pathways.
Risk assessment and remediation strategy.
Validation conclusions, certification and sign-off.

Synthetic evidence connection
A replacement laboratory table requires review of the draft soil finding and remediation assumptions.
CON-05 · laboratory table 3 · BH02

Connected working outputs

Contaminated-land assessment
Remediation action plan
Validation report

Heritage

Keep provenance and access restrictions beside heritage advice.

The manual work

Locate authorised Aboriginal and historic heritage records.
Reconcile survey reports, consultation records and design footprints.
Track revisions to avoidance measures and management advice.
Assemble evidence without circulating restricted cultural information.

How Knoy helps

Connect permitted records with source and sensitivity labels.
Trace advice to the authorised material supplied for the project.
Identify possible effects of design changes on reviewed measures.
Keep access and specialist-review requirements visible in working material.

What remains human

Cultural interpretation and engagement with knowledge holders.
Survey design and heritage significance assessment.
Consent, disclosure and cultural-protocol decisions.
Statutory advice and professional approval.

Synthetic evidence connection
Only a synthetic, unrestricted summary is shown; access to underlying cultural records must be agreed separately.
HER-03 · permitted summary · section 4

Connected working outputs

Heritage assessment
Heritage management plan
Consultation summary

Social and community

Connect what people raised to how the project responded.

The manual work

Reconcile engagement notes, submissions and stakeholder registers.
Find the source and context of a recurring issue.
Check that draft responses reflect the latest specialist advice.
Track commitments across consultation and assessment documents.

How Knoy helps

Group supplied issues while retaining their source context.
Connect draft responses to supporting evidence and review.
Compare commitments across versions and flag missing support.
Track response owners and unresolved information requests.

What remains human

Engagement design, consent and relationship building.
Interpretation of community perspectives and social impacts.
Privacy and materiality judgments.
Recommendations, commitments and final approval.

Synthetic evidence connection
A question about construction access links to a draft response, the design note and an open review task.
ENG-06 · synthetic issue S12

Connected working outputs

Social impact assessment
Consultation summary
Agency-response register

Climate and sustainability

Make assumptions visible from baseline to adaptation measure.

The manual work

Consolidate energy, activity and emissions data.
Recover factor versions, boundaries and scenario assumptions.
Reconcile adaptation measures across risk and design reports.
Update sustainability reporting when the project scope changes.

How Knoy helps

Link source data, calculation references and working narratives.
Compare assumptions and factors between report versions.
Connect identified risks to actions, owners and review stages.
Carry reviewed references into reporting and management outputs.

What remains human

Boundary setting and methodology selection.
Emissions calculations and scenario interpretation.
Climate-risk evaluation and sustainability recommendations.
Verification of claims and professional approval.

Synthetic evidence connection
A changed energy baseline is linked to the emissions narrative and a sustainability review request.
CLM-02 · assumptions register · A09

Connected working outputs

Climate-risk assessment
Sustainability report
Adaptation register

Hazards and risk

Keep the risk scenario connected to the control people must deliver.

The manual work

Recover hazard studies, bushfire constraints and design assumptions.
Reconcile risk registers with revised site layouts.
Check which controls are carried into management documents.
Track unresolved specialist recommendations and verification tasks.

How Knoy helps

Connect scenario evidence, findings and proposed controls.
Trace register entries to their supporting study or record.
Flag potentially affected measures after a design change.
Track owners, review decisions and outstanding evidence.

What remains human

Hazard identification and bushfire assessment.
Risk modelling and evaluation of consequences.
Selection and adequacy of controls.
Safety advice, certification and professional sign-off.

Synthetic evidence connection
A site-layout revision is flagged for review against access assumptions and the emergency-management plan.
RSK-03 · scenario H04

Connected working outputs

Hazard assessment
Bushfire assessment
Risk and controls register

Marine and coastal

Keep coastal observations, model assumptions and work windows connected.

The manual work

Reconcile benthic surveys, water-quality data and sediment records.
Find tide, wave and coastal-process assumptions in earlier studies.
Compare dredging or coastal-design revisions.
Update mitigation, monitoring and seasonal work-window commitments.

How Knoy helps

Connect survey records, technical reports and working findings.
Trace each cited result to its source and revision.
Identify possible changes to dependent controls and monitoring.
Coordinate marine ecology, coastal engineering and environmental review.

What remains human

Marine survey design and ecological interpretation.
Coastal-process and hydrodynamic modelling.
Impact evaluation and selection of monitoring triggers.
Specialist recommendations and approval.

Synthetic evidence connection
A revised survey record is linked to the marine assessment and the draft monitoring schedule.
MAR-04 · station M2 · survey log

Connected working outputs

Marine impact assessment
Coastal management plan
Marine monitoring report

Environmental management plans

Carry the reasoning behind a measure into the plan used on site.

The manual work

Extract measures from assessments, specialist advice and conditions.
Reconcile CEMP, OEMP and discipline sub-plan revisions.
Check owners, triggers, frequencies and escalation paths.
Keep working plans aligned with approved project changes.

How Knoy helps

Connect proposed controls to their original evidence and obligation.
Assemble source-backed working plan material.
Flag inconsistent measures and possible downstream change impacts.
Keep plan review, responsibilities and outstanding actions together.

What remains human

Selection of feasible and adequate controls.
Interpretation of approval conditions and site constraints.
Consultation, implementation planning and training.
Approval and responsibility for the management plan.

Synthetic evidence connection
The erosion-control measure links to its assessment source, plan owner and an unresolved design dependency.
COM-12 · measure M08

Connected working outputs

CEMP / OEMP
Environmental sub-plans
Erosion and sediment controls

Construction environmental management

Bring current evidence to the environmental decisions made during delivery.

The manual work

Find the current plan, work method and condition for an activity.
Reconcile site inspections, incidents and contractor correspondence.
Check monitoring dates and overdue corrective actions.
Update controls after staging, design or site-condition changes.

How Knoy helps

Connect activities to relevant plans, obligations and evidence.
Track action owners, status and supporting records.
Link incident and inspection records to follow-up work.
Prepare review material showing changed documents and open gaps.

What remains human

Site observation and interpretation of actual conditions.
Environmental risk decisions and response to incidents.
Direction of contractors and verification of controls.
Approval of corrective actions and work readiness.

Synthetic evidence connection
A drainage-control observation links to the current sub-plan and a corrective action awaiting site verification.
INS-09 · inspection item 06

Connected working outputs

Inspection record
Incident report
Corrective-action register

Post-approval and compliance

Keep an obligation alive beyond the document that introduced it.

The manual work

Reconcile approval conditions, commitments and permit updates.
Find records supporting each reporting obligation.
Chase owners and due dates across construction and operation.
Assemble periodic reports and check previous action closure.

How Knoy helps

Connect obligations to evidence, owners and reporting periods.
Show records that are missing or need refreshing.
Carry reviewed commitments from assessment into delivery.
Prepare source-backed compliance working packs.

What remains human

Interpretation of conditions and legal obligations.
Assessment of compliance and adequacy of evidence.
Regulator engagement and incident-notification decisions.
Approval, certification and submission of reports.

Synthetic evidence connection
The quarterly monitoring obligation has a linked record and remains open until the responsible reviewer checks it.
COND-06 · condition C14

Connected working outputs

Conditions register
Compliance report
Annual environmental report

Monitoring and inspections

Keep observations, triggers and follow-up work in view.

The manual work

Match field sheets and laboratory results to sampling locations.
Recover trigger definitions and the current monitoring program.
Reconcile inspection records, photographs and correspondence.
Track missing results, repeat visits and corrective-action evidence.

How Knoy helps

Connect monitoring results and inspection records to obligations.
Keep source versions and review status visible.
Track missing evidence, follow-up owners and due dates.
Prepare cited working summaries for professional review.

What remains human

Monitoring design and reliable field measurements.
Validation of instruments, samples and data quality.
Interpretation of triggers and response decisions.
Site verification and approval of reported findings.

Synthetic evidence connection
The monitoring record links to its program and a follow-up task; no compliance conclusion is inferred automatically.
MON-08 · location SW2 · record 17

Connected working outputs

Monitoring report
Inspection record
Follow-up action log

Environmental auditing

Build the evidence pack while preserving independent audit judgment.

The manual work

Map conditions and audit criteria to supporting evidence.
Search inspection records, correspondence and previous findings.
Track observations, corrective actions and closure records.
Assemble an audit pack with a defensible source trail.

How Knoy helps

Connect obligations to supporting records.
Show missing or outdated evidence and open requests.
Track owners, status and due dates with source history.
Prepare an evidence-backed audit working pack.

What remains human

Audit judgment, interviews and site observations.
Materiality assessment and evaluation of evidence.
Findings, recommendations and verification of action closure.
Independent certification and sign-off.

Synthetic evidence connection
An action is marked as awaiting verification because a contractor response alone does not establish closure.
AUD-02 · working paper 5 · finding F03

Connected working outputs

Audit working papers
Evidence pack
Corrective-action register

Multidisciplinary project leadership

See who needs what, and why a change matters to the wider project.

The manual work

Rebuild context across specialist reports, inboxes and project phases.
Track deliverables, information requests and review responsibilities.
Reconcile dependencies across ecology, water, landscape and visual impact.
Understand which decisions and outputs a late revision may affect.

How Knoy helps

Connect deliverables and owners to the evidence they depend on.
Keep technical reviews, decisions and information gaps in one context.
Identify possible change impacts across disciplines and phases.
Preserve authorised project knowledge for handovers and future work.

What remains human

Project strategy, scope, resourcing and client relationships.
Resolution of competing specialist advice and uncertainty.
Technical quality assurance, including landscape and visual assessment.
Accountability for delivery and professional approval.

Synthetic evidence connection
A revised access alignment links water, ecology and visual-impact reviews to the next deliverable milestone.
DEC-11 · design change 04

Connected working outputs

Deliverable tracker
Decision log
Change-impact assessment

Trust

Professionals make the environmental judgment.

Knoy handles the manual trail. Qualified professionals design investigations, interpret and verify evidence, assess impacts, resolve uncertainty, apply legislation and policy, recommend mitigation, approve and certify deliverables.

Professional interpretation, verification and approval remain human responsibilities.

Knoy does not replace BAM assessors, auditors, scientists, engineers, planners or other qualified environmental professionals.

Named project rolesOwner, editor and reviewer roles are checked for project actions.Implemented
Access checked at the data layerProject-membership policies are defined in the database. Confirm deployment and customer boundaries before sensitive use.Implemented
Review checks for generated outputsThe generated-output export route checks citations and approved output status. This does not guarantee every export path or technical correctness.Implemented
Minimum necessary contextStructured AI requests limit evidence excerpt count and length. Complete task-by-task disclosure is still in development.Partly implemented
Activity and source trailProject audit events and source anchors are recorded. This is not a complete, immutable audit-trail guarantee.Partly implemented
Deletion and retentionProject deletion is supported. Backup, retention and deletion-verification arrangements still need to be agreed.Partly implemented
Visible processing and authorised reuseConfirm provider, model route, location, processors and retention before restricted processing. Cross-project reuse and complete client isolation are not yet complete.Being designed for

Statuses describe controls found in the codebase, not an independent assurance of every deployed environment. Not every control is implemented yet.

Handling sensitive material?

Confirm hosting, model route, processors and retention before uploading restricted material: commercially confidential, personal, cultural heritage or government-sensitive information, unpublished field data, draft legal positions and client intellectual property. Read our privacy approach.

Bring your environmental work into one connected workspace.

Tell us about the work. We’ll explore how Knoy can connect its evidence, specialist workflows, decisions, reviews, delivery and compliance.

Talk to Knoy Sign in

Every environmental workflow. One place to know what matters.

Environmental work runs on evidence. Yet the evidence is scattered across reports, spreadsheets, inboxes and project drives.

Searching page 247.

Reconstructing the trail.

Repeating the same work.

From first field record to management and compliance.

See what the environmental work needs.

Every source, anchored to the page.

Drafts that cite as they go.

Specialist review, with the source beside it.

See what a change touches.

Carry reviewed working material into delivery.

Useful outputs, across the life of a project.

Assessment

Engagement and response

Management

Compliance

Project control

Organisational memory

One evidence chain

Project coordination

Start with the work you do.

Land, water and ecosystems

Specialist assessment and advice

Management and delivery

Professionals make the environmental judgment.

Bring your environmental work into one connected workspace.