From prompt
to production.

Proof connects the intended behavior, relevant checks, observed results and remaining gaps so reviewers spend less time reconstructing them. Required manual checks and product decisions remain explicit. A pilot measures the work saved on your changes, including setup and later rework.

It describes our ambition to bring requirements management, hazard analysis, MC/DC and formal methods into everyday agent workflows. Each method has a defined scope and needs appropriate inputs. Proof is not a DO-178C certification or a qualified replacement for your assurance process.

You can control what is required to be approved by humans and what is required to be approved by the agents. If you want the full agentic flow for the components you trust, that is totally possible. You can whitelist a component and say that it requires human approval whenever a change will touch it.

No. Proof is a platform, and it consists of these parts.

• Harness It lives inside your coding agent, works with any coding harness, and adds the required determinism and the engineering quality flow inside it. It then uploads these results to the dashboard.
• Orchestrator It lives inside your CI/CD. It can automatically triage all of the issues and the pull requests and do the code reviews for them. You can also connect it via MCP and make it work by generating the pull request with those changes, technically turning it into the AI factory you can actually trust.
• Dashboard Where those results go.
• MCP Humans or agents can use it to review the changes, see the overview of your system, and use this data to plan future changes or fix bugs.

Proof has a flow to recover the intent from your code comments, pull requests, and Jira for the initial onboarding. Moving forward, Proof can act as a sidecar, which works in parallel with your standard development. Or you can start using it for your development directly, and use requirement management as your source of truth.

If the change this pull request touches requires this kind of evidence, then yes. Proof does not cut corners. It enforces what kind of evidence is required for the given change. If that evidence is formal verification, then yes, it absolutely should be done. Proof also knows how to run only the required subset of the tests. It can cut your CI/CD time by running only the necessary tests, while increasing your test coverage multiple times.

Start with one change, in the agent workflow you already have. The repository stays closed on the first call. If you want the standing version, that is one component over about four weeks, with a few hours from the people who own it. The fee is quoted when the scope is clear, and fixed before the work starts. What we produce stays in your repository if you stop.