Skip to content

Add entrypoint extraction to AppYaml parser - #839

Merged
loosebazooka merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
entrypoint-to-appyaml
Jun 17, 2020
Merged

loosebazooka merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
entrypoint-to-appyaml

Conversation

@loosebazooka

@loosebazooka loosebazooka commented Jun 13, 2020 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

part of #840

also fixes some naming in tests.

NOTE: build is broken because of #841

@loosebazooka
loosebazooka force-pushed the entrypoint-to-appyaml branch from cb13437 to 33237bf Compare June 17, 2020 18:30
@loosebazooka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

rebased, this should be ready for review

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 17, 2020 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #839 into master will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #839   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     78.45%   78.46%           
- Complexity      609      610    +1     
=========================================
  Files            96       96           
  Lines          2409     2410    +1     
  Branches        282      282           
=========================================
+ Hits           1890     1891    +1     
  Misses          411      411           
  Partials        108      108           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...n/java/com/google/cloud/tools/project/AppYaml.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 16.00 <1.00> (+1.00)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 46bdd3e...33237bf. Read the comment docs.

@loosebazooka
loosebazooka merged commit df426fd into master Jun 17, 2020
@chanseokoh
chanseokoh deleted the entrypoint-to-appyaml branch June 17, 2020 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants