Skip to content

Code ligatures to add #305

Description

@arrowtype

Must do

<!--

DONE (Click to expand)

The opening HTML comment should be unified.

image

DONE (Click to expand)

See #296

put /f.mono in f_quotesingle.code rather than normal /f

image

Maybe do

Triple symbols

The middle of tripled symbols could be raised:

image

Wavy arrows?

Wavy arrows seem to be in other code ligature sets. What languages use them? Should they be added here?

Remove bracket ligatures?

Simplified "controversial" ligatures?

It may be possible to add a stylistic set to allow simplified versions of some "controversial" ligatures, such as <= and >=. Should I?

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Jan 23, 2020
  2. changed the title [-]Code ligatures remaining[/-] [+]Code ligatures issues to fix ASAP[/+] on Jan 23, 2020
  3. changed the title [-]Code ligatures issues to fix ASAP[/-] [+]Code ligatures to add[/+] on Aug 3, 2020
  4. arrowtype commented on Dec 10, 2020

    @arrowtype
    OwnerAuthor
    • remove f quote – it messes with syntax highlighting, and this Python f-strings would arguably be better without it.

    Done in sources; just has to be built into a release.
    image

    Other tasks:

    • Wavy arrows? Maybe in the future, but only if people actually request it.
    • Remove bracket ligatures? (These were messing up syntax highlighting.) Done.
    • Simplified "controversial" ligatures? Probably not. I’ve grown to like the controversial ones, and people can easily use the fonts without ligatures if they prefer
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions