Fix tight_layout for WCSAxes - #12418

Should we write a figure test specifically showing tight_layout working?

Given this didn't change any existing tests, sounds good - I'm not sure which of the files under wcsaxes/tests it's best to add the tests to though, any thoughts?

pick one 🙈, the one with the most useful fixtures is probably the best, maybe test_images.py?

Hello @dstansby 👋! It looks like you've made some changes in your pull request, so I've checked the code again for style.

There are no PEP8 style issues with this pull request - thanks! 🎉

Comment last updated at 2022-09-08 20:54:12 UTC

Hi humans 👋 - this pull request hasn't had any new commits for approximately 4 months. I plan to close this in 30 days if the pull request doesn't have any new commits by then.

In lieu of a stalled pull request, please consider closing this and open an issue instead if a reminder is needed to revisit in the future. Maintainers may also choose to add keep-open label to keep this PR open but it is discouraged unless absolutely necessary.

If this PR still needs to be reviewed, as an author, you can rebase it to reset the clock.

If you believe I commented on this pull request incorrectly, please report this here.

I think this is worth pursusing - I don't have time to figure out how to update fiugre tests in astropy at the moment, but if someone else has the motivation to feel free to push to my branch or create a new branch+PR off this branch.

I will need to rebase once #12630 is merged to get the latest infrastructure changes

Hmm... Did you break the autobackport bot? lol

@meeseeksdev backport to v5.0.x

@meeseeksdev backport to v5.1.x

Thanks a lot @astrofrog for finishing off my PRs!