Skip to content

Move table.Row class into its own submodule table/row.py - #2872

Merged
taldcroft merged 1 commit into
astropy:masterfrom
taldcroft:table-row
Aug 20, 2014
Merged

taldcroft merged 1 commit into
astropy:masterfrom
taldcroft:table-row

Conversation

@taldcroft

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Try to fix #2871.

cc: @embray

@taldcroft

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Whether or not this fixes #2871 I think it is probably a good idea just to reduce lines in table.py.

@astrofrog

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree, I'm all for smaller files :) 👍

@mhvk

mhvk commented Aug 19, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes, all for it, even if it doesn't resolve #2871

@embray embray added this to the v0.4.2 milestone Aug 19, 2014
@embray

embray commented Aug 19, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Also totally fine by me. I think this can go in 0.4.2 since it doesn't change the ability to from astropy.table import Row. Up to you though.

@embray

embray commented Aug 19, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As noted over there, this does not entirely resolve #2871 (although now the time module is the culprit instead of table) but this is not a bad idea in its own right.

taldcroft added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2014
Move table.Row class into its own submodule table/row.py
@taldcroft
taldcroft merged commit 04d5ecb into astropy:master Aug 20, 2014
@taldcroft
taldcroft deleted the table-row branch August 20, 2014 02:22
taldcroft added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2014
Move table.Row class into its own submodule table/row.py
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Parallel testing on Python >= 3.3 breaks due to pseudo-nondeterministic test collection

4 participants