Skip to content

UI Notification Center #282

Open
Open

Description

@chrizbo

Provide the notification center UI with unread counts, filters, and actions.
Related to #282

Generated by Launch Creator · gpt50 18.9K · ◷

Activity

  1. chrizbo commented on Jun 8, 2026

    @chrizbo
    OwnerAuthor

    Created related issue: #282

  2. github-actions commented on Jun 8, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    🔍 Assumptions Worth Discussing

    I found 3 high-risk assumption(s) in this issue that might be worth making explicit. These aren't criticisms — they're invitations to align.

    1. Backend API availability

    "Provide the notification center UI with unread counts, filters, and actions."\n\nThe assumption: There exist server-side APIs and contracts to provide unread counts, queryable filters, and actions (mark read/delete/act) that the UI can call.

    Why it matters: Without these endpoints or agreed contracts, the UI can't be implemented or will require backend work that blocks frontend progress.

    Question for the team: Are there existing APIs and an owner for notification counts, filtering, and actions? If not, can we agree on the API contract and timeline?


    2. Notification data model & semantics

    "Provide the notification center UI with unread counts, filters, and actions."\n\nThe assumption: The schema and semantics (what counts as unread, available filter fields, time ranges, ownership) are defined and stable.

    Why it matters: Unclear or changing semantics will cause rework across frontend/backends and could change UX behavior.

    Question for the team: Who defines the notification schema and can we document the fields/semantics needed by the UI?


    3. Performance & consistency expectations

    "Provide the notification center UI with unread counts, filters, and actions."\n\nThe assumption: Unread counts and filters can be returned at acceptable latency and consistency for expected traffic.

    Why it matters: Calculating counts or filtering at read time can be expensive at scale; this may require pre-aggregation or eventual consistency trade-offs.

    Question for the team: Do we need real-time accurate counts at scale, or is eventual consistency acceptable? Who can advise on expected traffic/scale?


    🤔 Things Not Mentioned

    • Design/UX mockups — who will provide them? — Product or Design.
    • Accessibility requirements (keyboard, screen reader) — Accessibility lead or PM.
    • Analytics/telemetry for notification interactions — Analytics or PM.

    🧩 This comment was generated by the Assumption Surfacer workflow to help the team reason together. Reply to any assumption above to share your perspective.

    Generated by Assumption Surfacer for issue #282 · gpt50 29.6K · ◷

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions