#602's run starts at a credential with two name words in front of it, and "a lone particle is not a name word for the count" (rules.md#S2). The test is len(piece) == 1 and "particle" in tags, so a P3-joined particle phrase (von und zu, one piece of three tokens, tagged prefix) is no lone particle and counts:
| Input |
Today |
John von PhD Jones |
given 'John', middle 'von PhD', family 'Jones' (no run) |
John von und zu PhD Jones |
given 'John', family 'von und zu', suffix 'PhD Jones' |
Berg von und zu PhD Jones Smith |
given 'Berg', family 'von und zu', suffix 'PhD Jones Smith' |
The two disagree about whether a particle with nothing after it is a name word. Question: should the joined phrase count as the lone particle does (use is_prefix_piece's definition), or should a lone particle before a credential count as the family it then becomes? Either one moves readings; measure on the S2 grid.
#602's run starts at a credential with two name words in front of it, and "a lone particle is not a name word for the count" (rules.md#S2). The test is
len(piece) == 1 and "particle" in tags, so a P3-joined particle phrase (von und zu, one piece of three tokens, taggedprefix) is no lone particle and counts:John von PhD JonesJohn von und zu PhD JonesBerg von und zu PhD Jones SmithThe two disagree about whether a particle with nothing after it is a name word. Question: should the joined phrase count as the lone particle does (use
is_prefix_piece's definition), or should a lone particle before a credential count as the family it then becomes? Either one moves readings; measure on the S2 grid.