Repository navigation
feat: add Reply.prototype.mediaType - #6932
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
github-actions
Bot
added
the
documentation
Eomm
reviewed
Aug 10, 2026
Signed-off-by: Livia Medeiros <[email protected]>
climba03003
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2026
climba03003
added
the
backport 5.x
jean-michelet
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2026
climba03003
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2026
* feat: add `Reply.prototype.mediaType` * additional test --------- (cherry picked from commit eaff726) Signed-off-by: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Livia Medeiros <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Livia Medeiros <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Request.prototype.mediaTypeis a surprisingly useful getter, since it eliminates the urge to use ad hocContent-Typeparsing.I wonder if we can have it on
reply, too.Checklist
npm run test && npm run benchmark --if-presentand the Code of conduct