Repository navigation
Revert "Add the ability to ignore lines depending on comments" - #59813
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This reverts commit df02518.
fluttergithubbot
added
the
tool
Contributor
|
It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat. Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. |
Contributor
|
LGTM |
zljj0818
pushed a commit
to zljj0818/flutter
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2020
…r#58656)" (flutter#59813) This reverts commit df02518.
7 of 8 tasks
mingwandroid
pushed a commit
to mingwandroid/flutter
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2020
…r#58656)" (flutter#59813) This reverts commit df02518.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #58656
Unfortunately we need to revert this for now because coverage hasn't rolled into google3 yet :(
TBR @christopherfujino