Repository navigation
Conversation
…est class We already don't allow unused parameters from non-generic classes. There was a bug preventing us from reporting such parameters on generic classes. This is work towards dart-lang/sdk#47839.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the _CustomPageRoute class in packages/material_ui/test/scaffold_test.dart by removing the maintainState parameter from its constructor and instead overriding the maintainState getter to always return true. There are no review comments, and I have no feedback to provide.
|
Why were override labels added to this PR? The tooling should not flag a |
|
They were added because I didn't think any versioning was needed, nor any changelog. |
|
Thanks, I was just surprised to see the labels on a PR that said it was only changing test code, so I wanted to make sure there wasn't a tooling bug. Generally we add the labels only to actually override the tooling when its heuristic is incorrect. |
… class (flutter#191764) We already don't allow unused parameters from non-generic classes. There was a bug preventing us from reporting such parameters on generic classes. This is work towards dart-lang/sdk#47839 This is mirrored at flutter/packages#12629 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [AI contribution guidelines] and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [AI contribution guidelines]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#ai-contribution-guidelines [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
|
Could you help fix the conflict and the failed Dashboard Checks? |
|
OK fixed conflicts a second time. |
We already don't allow unused parameters from non-generic classes. There was a bug preventing us from reporting such parameters on generic classes.
This is work towards dart-lang/sdk#47839.
Pre-Review Checklist
[shared_preferences]///).Footnotes
Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling. ↩ ↩2