Skip to content

Should our promises be documented as first class? #1699

Description

@stephenplusplus

Continuing #1697 (comment):

Should we be promoting promise use first, as in "this is the way to use our library", with a mention about callbacks? Since the demand for promises is so strong, I'm wondering if we might be better off changing our position to a promise library that supports callbacks instead of the other way around.

Activity

  1. callmehiphop commented on Oct 17, 2016

    @callmehiphop
    Contributor
  2. SimenB commented on Oct 18, 2016

    @SimenB
    Contributor

    As a complete outsider, I vote yes!
    Especially with async await on the horizon, it's a way better way of writing async code

  3. evaogbe commented on Aug 11, 2017

    @evaogbe
    Contributor

    This issue may no longer be relevant due to its age. Feel free to re-open.

  4. evaogbe commented on Feb 2, 2021

    @evaogbe
    Contributor

    I am no longer on the team

  5. removed their assignment
    on Feb 2, 2021
  6. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

corepriority: p2Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions