Repository navigation
Switch Protocol Buffers lib #474
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
type: questionRequest for information or clarification. Not an issue.Request for information or clarification. Not an issue.
Description
Activity
- addedtype: questionRequest for information or clarification. Not an issue.Request for information or clarification. Not an issue.
on Apr 1, 2015 Interesting. I'm all for speed and simplicity, especially when we have performance regressions or we are implementing with it. Not sure we have either of those scenarios so my comment is "why bother?" at least right now. I worry we'd see compatibility issues if not everything is implemented in this new library. Good to keep on the radar.
Fair enough, we'll just close this for now, and if we find the need for something new in the future, we can review this one again.
26 remaining items
- added a commit that references this issue
on Jan 28, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Feb 5, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Feb 17, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Feb 23, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Feb 24, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Feb 26, 2026
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
type: questionRequest for information or clarification. Not an issue.Request for information or clarification. Not an issue.
Just stumbled upon this: https://github.com/mafintosh/protocol-buffers - maybe worth integrating? Looks simple and fast.