Skip to content

Make strategic function application operators handle strategies correctly - #61

Merged
konsumlamm merged 1 commit into
haskell:masterfrom
konsumlamm:strategic-operators
Jan 21, 2024
Merged

konsumlamm merged 1 commit into
haskell:masterfrom
konsumlamm:strategic-operators

Conversation

@konsumlamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes #43.

@konsumlamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@simonmar what do you think?

@konsumlamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@simonmar ?

@konsumlamm konsumlamm mentioned this pull request Dec 29, 2023
@Kleidukos
Kleidukos requested a review from treeowl January 19, 2024 15:48

@treeowl treeowl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@konsumlamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@Kleidukos do you still want to review or can I go ahead and merge?

@Kleidukos Kleidukos left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@konsumlamm
konsumlamm merged commit b60237e into haskell:master Jan 21, 2024
@konsumlamm
konsumlamm deleted the strategic-operators branch January 21, 2024 20:21
konsumlamm added a commit to treeowl/parallel that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Strategic function application operators don't quite match their documentation

3 participants