[SYCL] Compile with fat archive with multiple objects - #112

Swift async functions can miscompile on Windows ARM64 at `-O2`, when
there's enough register pressure that a local gets scavenged into the
callee-save area: the local ends up sharing an address with the saved
caller x29, so the epilogue restores a value the function has already
overwritten. swiftlang/swift#90920 has a reduced repro.

`assignCalleeSavedSpillSlots` creates the swift async context object
before the callee-save loop instead of inside it next to the FP slot.
MachineFrameInfo ends up with it above the frame record while the
prologue stores it below at FP-8, and the 8 byte disagreement leaves a
hole in the middle of the callee-save area. PEI's scavenger hands that
hole to the local. Only reproduces at -O2 and up since scavenging is
gated on the opt level.

```
	sub	sp, sp, #112
	str	x19, [sp, #16]                  // 8-byte Spill
	str	x21, [sp, #24]                  // 8-byte Spill
	stp	x23, x24, [sp, #32]             // 16-byte Folded Spill
	stp	x25, x26, [sp, #48]             // 16-byte Folded Spill
	stp	x27, x28, [sp, #64]             // 16-byte Folded Spill
	stp	x29, x30, [sp, #88]             // 16-byte Folded Spill
	str	xzr, [sp, #80]
	add	x29, sp, #88
	...
	str	x7, [x29]                       // 8-byte Spill
	...
	ldr	x1, [x29]                       // 8-byte Reload
	ldp	x29, x30, [sp, #88]             // 16-byte Folded Reload
```

This creates the object inside the loop so the two agree. The other
option was leaving the creation site alone and teaching MachineFrameInfo
about the expanded 24 byte FP/LR slot, but that puts the layout in two
places. Not sure which is preferred here, I don't know this code well.

This also asserts the saved FP object resolves to FP+0, since nothing
checks that today. Reverting the fix makes it fire on the same funclet.
`store-swift-async-context-clobber-live-reg.ll` already miscompiles with
`-regalloc=fast`, so this isn't Swift specific.

Swift async functions can miscompile on Windows ARM64 at `-O2`, when
there's enough register pressure that a local gets scavenged into the
callee-save area: the local ends up sharing an address with the saved
caller x29, so the epilogue restores a value the function has already
overwritten. swiftlang/swift#90920 has a reduced repro.

`assignCalleeSavedSpillSlots` creates the swift async context object
before the callee-save loop instead of inside it next to the FP slot.
MachineFrameInfo ends up with it above the frame record while the
prologue stores it below at FP-8, and the 8 byte disagreement leaves a
hole in the middle of the callee-save area. PEI's scavenger hands that
hole to the local. Only reproduces at -O2 and up since scavenging is
gated on the opt level.

```
	sub	sp, sp, #112
	str	x19, [sp, #16]                  // 8-byte Spill
	str	x21, [sp, #24]                  // 8-byte Spill
	stp	x23, x24, [sp, #32]             // 16-byte Folded Spill
	stp	x25, x26, [sp, #48]             // 16-byte Folded Spill
	stp	x27, x28, [sp, #64]             // 16-byte Folded Spill
	stp	x29, x30, [sp, #88]             // 16-byte Folded Spill
	str	xzr, [sp, #80]
	add	x29, sp, #88
	...
	str	x7, [x29]                       // 8-byte Spill
	...
	ldr	x1, [x29]                       // 8-byte Reload
	ldp	x29, x30, [sp, #88]             // 16-byte Folded Reload
```

This creates the object inside the loop so the two agree. The other
option was leaving the creation site alone and teaching MachineFrameInfo
about the expanded 24 byte FP/LR slot, but that puts the layout in two
places. Not sure which is preferred here, I don't know this code well.

This also asserts the saved FP object resolves to FP+0, since nothing
checks that today. Reverting the fix makes it fire on the same funclet.
`store-swift-async-context-clobber-live-reg.ll` already miscompiles with
`-regalloc=fast`, so this isn't Swift specific.

(cherry picked from commit c358e8d)