Repository navigation
[ImgBot] Optimize images - #2
Open
imgbot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
imgbot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
imgbot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
*Total -- 5,345.59kb -> 3,818.84kb (28.56%) /docs/public/logo.png -- 19.00kb -> 6.26kb (67.05%) /docs/public/blocks-live.png -- 1,952.39kb -> 1,290.24kb (33.91%) /docs/public/screenshot.png -- 2,438.42kb -> 1,695.04kb (30.49%) /docs/public/codex-cli-monthly.jpeg -- 491.54kb -> 432.25kb (12.06%) /docs/public/codex-cli.jpeg -- 441.41kb -> 392.33kb (11.12%) /docs/public/logo.svg -- 1.42kb -> 1.35kb (4.74%) /docs/public/favicon.svg -- 1.42kb -> 1.35kb (4.74%) Signed-off-by: ImgBotApp <[email protected]>
jay-tau
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2026
…e comments External PR ccusage#1209 code review identified the single recommended maintainer gate before merge: strip references to ephemeral, private development artifacts ("plan finding #N", "GPT-5.5 R12/R14", "Piece B/C", "round-1/2 finding", "plan round-3 finding", "seq-7 round-1B") from shipped code. These were meaningful to the author during the iterative development + multi-model review process, but read as noise (or confusion) to a future maintainer six months out. Preserve the substance of every comment — what the code does and why — while dropping the development-internal identifiers: - `plan finding ccusage#10` → "Aggregate-only credits path:" - `plan finding from PR ccusage#957 + GPT-5.5 R12` → "Skip rule for per-model metrics rows:" (PR ccusage#957 citation kept — external + persistent) - `plan finding ccusage#7` → "in real session-state data" - `plan finding #2` → (dropped — comment is self-explanatory) - `plan finding for GPT-5.5 R14` → "Dedup key selection:" - `plan finding ccusage#3 / Piece C carry-over from PR ccusage#957` → "carried over from PR ccusage#957's TypeScript implementation" - `round-1/2 finding` → "documented invariant" - `// ----- Piece B (credits) -----` → "AI Credits tests (totalNanoAiu)" - `plan finding #1` → (dropped) - `plan finding ccusage#8` → (dropped — paraphrased into the comment) - `plan round-3 finding` → (dropped — paraphrased into the comment) - `mirrors the seq-7 round-1B parser fixture fix` → (dropped — the preceding sentences already explain the genuinely-absent-vs-Some(0) reasoning standalone) PR ccusage#957 references stay (external, persistent, useful for context). External symbol/test/file references all resolve. No behavioral change. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
jay-tau
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2026
External PR ccusage#1209 code review (9th pass, prioritized #2) noted that the generic `shared_claude_options` --mode help entry lists `api` as a choice but doesn't explain it ('Cost calculation mode'). The copilot-scoped --mode entry already documents it (added in f49a0c3), but the Claude/shared help didn't — users running `ccusage claude daily --help` see the `api` choice with no explanation. Update the shared description to match the parity hint: 'Cost calculation mode (api is an alias for calculate)'. Keeps the description short while making the alias discoverable wherever --mode appears. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
jay-tau
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
…e comments External PR ccusage#1209 code review identified the single recommended maintainer gate before merge: strip references to ephemeral, private development artifacts ("plan finding #N", "GPT-5.5 R12/R14", "Piece B/C", "round-1/2 finding", "plan round-3 finding", "seq-7 round-1B") from shipped code. These were meaningful to the author during the iterative development + multi-model review process, but read as noise (or confusion) to a future maintainer six months out. Preserve the substance of every comment — what the code does and why — while dropping the development-internal identifiers: - `plan finding ccusage#10` → "Aggregate-only credits path:" - `plan finding from PR ccusage#957 + GPT-5.5 R12` → "Skip rule for per-model metrics rows:" (PR ccusage#957 citation kept — external + persistent) - `plan finding ccusage#7` → "in real session-state data" - `plan finding #2` → (dropped — comment is self-explanatory) - `plan finding for GPT-5.5 R14` → "Dedup key selection:" - `plan finding ccusage#3 / Piece C carry-over from PR ccusage#957` → "carried over from PR ccusage#957's TypeScript implementation" - `round-1/2 finding` → "documented invariant" - `// ----- Piece B (credits) -----` → "AI Credits tests (totalNanoAiu)" - `plan finding #1` → (dropped) - `plan finding ccusage#8` → (dropped — paraphrased into the comment) - `plan round-3 finding` → (dropped — paraphrased into the comment) - `mirrors the seq-7 round-1B parser fixture fix` → (dropped — the preceding sentences already explain the genuinely-absent-vs-Some(0) reasoning standalone) PR ccusage#957 references stay (external, persistent, useful for context). External symbol/test/file references all resolve. No behavioral change. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
jay-tau
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
External PR ccusage#1209 code review (9th pass, prioritized #2) noted that the generic `shared_claude_options` --mode help entry lists `api` as a choice but doesn't explain it ('Cost calculation mode'). The copilot-scoped --mode entry already documents it (added in f49a0c3), but the Claude/shared help didn't — users running `ccusage claude daily --help` see the `api` choice with no explanation. Update the shared description to match the parity hint: 'Cost calculation mode (api is an alias for calculate)'. Keeps the description short while making the alias discoverable wherever --mode appears. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
jay-tau
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2026
…e comments External PR ccusage#1209 code review identified the single recommended maintainer gate before merge: strip references to ephemeral, private development artifacts ("plan finding #N", "GPT-5.5 R12/R14", "Piece B/C", "round-1/2 finding", "plan round-3 finding", "seq-7 round-1B") from shipped code. These were meaningful to the author during the iterative development + multi-model review process, but read as noise (or confusion) to a future maintainer six months out. Preserve the substance of every comment — what the code does and why — while dropping the development-internal identifiers: - `plan finding ccusage#10` → "Aggregate-only credits path:" - `plan finding from PR ccusage#957 + GPT-5.5 R12` → "Skip rule for per-model metrics rows:" (PR ccusage#957 citation kept — external + persistent) - `plan finding ccusage#7` → "in real session-state data" - `plan finding #2` → (dropped — comment is self-explanatory) - `plan finding for GPT-5.5 R14` → "Dedup key selection:" - `plan finding ccusage#3 / Piece C carry-over from PR ccusage#957` → "carried over from PR ccusage#957's TypeScript implementation" - `round-1/2 finding` → "documented invariant" - `// ----- Piece B (credits) -----` → "AI Credits tests (totalNanoAiu)" - `plan finding #1` → (dropped) - `plan finding ccusage#8` → (dropped — paraphrased into the comment) - `plan round-3 finding` → (dropped — paraphrased into the comment) - `mirrors the seq-7 round-1B parser fixture fix` → (dropped — the preceding sentences already explain the genuinely-absent-vs-Some(0) reasoning standalone) PR ccusage#957 references stay (external, persistent, useful for context). External symbol/test/file references all resolve. No behavioral change. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
jay-tau
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2026
External PR ccusage#1209 code review (9th pass, prioritized #2) noted that the generic `shared_claude_options` --mode help entry lists `api` as a choice but doesn't explain it ('Cost calculation mode'). The copilot-scoped --mode entry already documents it (added in f49a0c3), but the Claude/shared help didn't — users running `ccusage claude daily --help` see the `api` choice with no explanation. Update the shared description to match the parity hint: 'Cost calculation mode (api is an alias for calculate)'. Keeps the description short while making the alias discoverable wherever --mode appears. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
jay-tau
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2026
…e comments External PR ccusage#1209 code review identified the single recommended maintainer gate before merge: strip references to ephemeral, private development artifacts ("plan finding #N", "GPT-5.5 R12/R14", "Piece B/C", "round-1/2 finding", "plan round-3 finding", "seq-7 round-1B") from shipped code. These were meaningful to the author during the iterative development + multi-model review process, but read as noise (or confusion) to a future maintainer six months out. Preserve the substance of every comment — what the code does and why — while dropping the development-internal identifiers: - `plan finding ccusage#10` → "Aggregate-only credits path:" - `plan finding from PR ccusage#957 + GPT-5.5 R12` → "Skip rule for per-model metrics rows:" (PR ccusage#957 citation kept — external + persistent) - `plan finding ccusage#7` → "in real session-state data" - `plan finding #2` → (dropped — comment is self-explanatory) - `plan finding for GPT-5.5 R14` → "Dedup key selection:" - `plan finding ccusage#3 / Piece C carry-over from PR ccusage#957` → "carried over from PR ccusage#957's TypeScript implementation" - `round-1/2 finding` → "documented invariant" - `// ----- Piece B (credits) -----` → "AI Credits tests (totalNanoAiu)" - `plan finding #1` → (dropped) - `plan finding ccusage#8` → (dropped — paraphrased into the comment) - `plan round-3 finding` → (dropped — paraphrased into the comment) - `mirrors the seq-7 round-1B parser fixture fix` → (dropped — the preceding sentences already explain the genuinely-absent-vs-Some(0) reasoning standalone) PR ccusage#957 references stay (external, persistent, useful for context). External symbol/test/file references all resolve. No behavioral change. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
jay-tau
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2026
External PR ccusage#1209 code review (9th pass, prioritized #2) noted that the generic `shared_claude_options` --mode help entry lists `api` as a choice but doesn't explain it ('Cost calculation mode'). The copilot-scoped --mode entry already documents it (added in f49a0c3), but the Claude/shared help didn't — users running `ccusage claude daily --help` see the `api` choice with no explanation. Update the shared description to match the parity hint: 'Cost calculation mode (api is an alias for calculate)'. Keeps the description short while making the alias discoverable wherever --mode appears. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Beep boop. Your images are optimized!
Your image file size has been reduced by 29% 🎉
Details
📝 docs |
repo | 🙋🏾 issues | 🏪 marketplace
~Imgbot - Part of Optimole family