Repository navigation
Conversation
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
async_hooks
Contributor
Author
Member
|
cc/ @nodejs/async_hooks |
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2018
AndreasMadsen
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2018
cjihrig
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2018
addaleax
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2018
ofrobots
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2018
ofrobots
left a comment
ofrobots
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM w/ teeny nit: use async_hooks rather than async_hook in the commit abstract.
This commit removes the builtin async_wrap module from lib/async_hooks.js. The motivation for this is that lib/async_hooks.js requires lib/internal/async_hooks which also binds async_wrap. Instead of lib/async_hooks.js also binding async_wrap it now only has to require the internal async_hooks and access it's exports. There might be a very good reason for doing it the current way but the reason is not obvious to me. Hopefully someone can shed some light on this.
danbev
force-pushed
the
async_hook_js_confinement
branch
from
March 16, 2018 12:09
c4b3820 to
35d770b
Compare
danbev
changed the title
lpinca
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2018
lpinca
added
the
author ready
Contributor
Author
|
Landed in 8c46fa6. |
danbev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2018
This commit removes the builtin async_wrap module from lib/async_hooks.js. The motivation for this is that lib/async_hooks.js requires lib/internal/async_hooks which also binds async_wrap. Instead of lib/async_hooks.js also binding async_wrap it now only has to require the internal async_hooks and access it's exports. There might be a very good reason for doing it the current way but the reason is not obvious to me. Hopefully someone can shed some light on this. PR-URL: #19368 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ali Ijaz Sheikh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Contributor
|
Should this be backported to |
tniessen
removed
the
author ready
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
12 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit removes the builtin async_wrap module from
lib/async_hooks.js.
The motivation for this is that lib/async_hooks.js requires
lib/internal/async_hooks which also binds async_wrap. Instead of
lib/async_hooks.js also binding async_wrap it now only has to require
the internal async_hooks and access it's exports.
There might be a very good reason for doing it the current way but the
reason is not obvious to me. Hopefully someone can shed some light on
this.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes