Repository navigation
TST: remove obsolete TestF77Mismatch - #20457
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
That circleci error has turned up before, but doesn't seem to persist after merge. If you are not branched from main HEAD, I'm curious if a rebase would have an effect. |
Contributor
Author
Sorry, I had messed up my branches before pushing. 😅 Should now be rebased correctly! |
h-vetinari
added a commit
to regro-cf-autotick-bot/numpy-feedstock
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2022
- test_sincos_float32 taken care of in numpy/numpy#20274 - TestF77Mismatch removed upstream in numpy/numpy#20457 - test_unary_PyUFunc_O_O_method_full fixed in 1.22 (numpy/numpy#19926)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes a test that is not necessary anymore since g77 is gone (and it fails in certain situations like when run through emulation in conda-forge CI), as discussed in #20445.