You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Have C1, S2 or P6 grown by patching the way M2 had, and should they be rethought? #611
Why. M2 had grown one stop or release check at a time across #424, #533, #535, #538 and #549, until a guard had to model three other stages' joins to stay correct. #601 rethought it from the top and deleted that machinery. docs/design/AGENTS.md now names the signs: the rule works by scanning and stopping, each fix added a stop or an exception, and a guard models what another stage would do. That last sign is the decisive one. mechanisms.md now records the two patterns the rethink used, READ-WITHOUT-THEN-BIND and LICENSED-BY-NEIGHBOR.
Rule length alone isn't the signal. Measured 2026-10-04:
Rule
decisions.md entries
decisions.md words
Rule prose words
S2
35
18,637
2,408
R4
35
14,296
1,451
C1
15
12,308
2,445
P3
11
7,052
1,351
P6
10
6,024
1,510
R4's entries are mostly vocabulary and rendering cases rather than added stops, so it's out of scope here.
The question. For each of C1, S2 and P6, does it show the decisive sign? If so, what would the READ-WITHOUT-THEN-BIND or LICENSED-BY-NEIGHBOR version look like, and roughly what would it move?
Activity
Merge pull request #615 from derek73/feat/issue-603-611-c1-rethink
decisions.md: record derek73#611's outcome, the rethinks filed as der…
Decide C1 once, at the head of group, and bind the part it decides (d…
Decide P6's comma site in assign, in the pass that reads the given pa…