Skip to content

Ship DevTools with dart2wasm #7856

Closed
Closed

Description

@kenzieschmoll

The DevTools codebase is prepared for building DevTools with dart2wasm thanks to the unblocking work here.

There are still a few requirements that we need to meet before moving this effort forward:

Compare the dart2wasm DevTools build to dart2js and file any issues that come up.

Blocking:

Activity

  1. added
    P1high priority issues at the top of the work list, actively being worked on.
    on May 30, 2024
  2. kevmoo commented on May 30, 2024

    @kevmoo
    Contributor

    @kenzieschmoll – keep in mind, we can use query param magic to force loading certain versions. So if there are contexts where wasm won't work, we can just disable them. Or we can make loading the wasm version opt-in for testing, etc.

  3. kevmoo commented on May 30, 2024

    @kevmoo
    Contributor

    Ha! just read your last bullet. 🤦

  4. DanTup commented on May 31, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    Ensure that the VS Code embedded web views support WasmGC (see background information on Chromium and V8)

    The current version of VS Code uses Chromium v120 which sounds like it should support this. However, I don't know if there are things in Electron/VS Code themselves that might impact the user of this. @kenzieschmoll what's the easiest way for me to build DevTools using WASM (can I do it through devtools_tool serve? hacking scripts locally to make this work would be fine for testing).

    And when it is running, how do I confirm it is using the wasm version and didn't fall back to js?

  5. kenzieschmoll commented on May 31, 2024

    @kenzieschmoll
    MemberAuthor

    what's the easiest way for me to build DevTools using WASM (can I do it through devtools_tool serve? hacking scripts locally to make this work would be fine for testing).

    And when it is running, how do I confirm it is using the wasm version and didn't fall back to js?

    Patch the changes from #7867 and https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/369100. Then run devtools_tool serve --wasm.

    If the wasm changes are picked up, you should see main.dart.wasm, main.dart.mjs, and canvaskit/skwasm.js, canvaskit/skwasm.wasm in the loaded sources. Here is what I see locally.
    Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 8 45 45 AM

  6. helin24 commented on May 31, 2024

    @helin24
    Member

    IntelliJ uses JxBrowser version 7.38.2 currently, which includes Chromium 124.0.6367.92 and should support WasmGC.

    It's hard for me to tell what version of JCEF IntelliJ uses when that option is chosen by user setting, but JCEF is a few versions behind the CEF library, which currently is using Chromium 125 (https://cef-builds.spotifycdn.com/index.html).

    In summary I think either implementation of embedded browser will be fine for wasm.

  7. xster commented on May 31, 2024

    @xster
    Member

    @yjbanov the sequencing will likely be that we'll work on shipping devtools in wasm in google after we decide to ship flutter web in wasm in google3

  8. DanTup commented on Jun 4, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    @kenzieschmoll

    Patch the changes from #7867 and https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/369100. Then run devtools_tool serve --wasm.

    The first has already landed but I patched in the second. I added "--wasm" to my dart.customDevTools setting. Inside VS Code, it seems to have loaded the JS version:

    image

    However if I open in an external browser it loads the wasm version, however it throws and the app doesn't load:

    image

    I presume the first issue is that whatever is being used to detect whether wasm is available is failing. @kevmoo is there an easy way for me to review (or step through) these conditions? Looking through flutter_bootstrap.js I found a function that looked like it was doing that which runs:

    let o = [0, 97, 115, 109, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 5, 1, 95, 1, 120, 0];
    return WebAssembly.validate(new Uint8Array(o))
    

    However if I run that myself in the console, it appears to return true, so I think there may be other conditions.

    image

  9. DanTup commented on Jun 4, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    Seems like the issue is that window.crossOriginIsolated is false

    image

    The docs here confirm the headers in the CL above are required, but I see those are also set:

    image

    It's not clear to me why this value is false. There's a similar issue at microsoft/vscode#183765 from last year about this being the case on Github.dev and a link to a private repo with a fix, which I suspect is just setting the same headers.

  10. DanTup commented on Jun 4, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    I tracked this back to microsoft/vscode#186614. It seems cross-origin-isolatation is currently disabled by VS Code. When it was enabled the were performance issues that resulted in it being reverted.

    I tried running code --enable-coi to force this enabled for testing, however the iframe with DevTools in it won't load at all:

    image

    Which seems to be because another header is not present:

    image

    I don't know the implications of adding that header.

  11. eyebrowsoffire commented on Jun 4, 2024

    @eyebrowsoffire
    Contributor

    Yes, if you're loading the app in an iframe, you will need to set a CORP header for the child document if you want cross origin isolation (which is needed for the multi-threaded rendering that the skwasm renderer does). I don't know exactly how the embedding of this works with VS Code. I think Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy: cross-origin should be fine for this use case, as long as all the assets that devtools uses are also served with Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy: cross-origin.

  12. DanTup commented on Jun 5, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    Thanks! Adding that header on its own didn't work, but then I found I needed allow="cross-origin-isolated" on the iframe. With that, the flags are all true and the wasm version is used - and fails with:

    image

    This is the same error I posted above when running outside of VS Code. It's not clear to me if that's a DevTools or wasm bug?

  13. added a commit that references this issue on Jun 5, 2024
  14. 7 remaining items

  15. kenzieschmoll commented on Jul 10, 2024

    @kenzieschmoll
    MemberAuthor

    @DanTup now that the regression with accessing the Flutter store file has been fixed, are you able to verify whether the wasm build works properly when embedded in VS Code now?

  16. DanTup commented on Jul 10, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    cross-origin-isolate is still gated with a flag in VS Code (so normal users can't get a wasm version), but if I:

    1. Run code --enable-coi to enable cross-origin-isolate
    2. Patch in ..add('Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy', 'cross-origin') into the DevTools server
    3. Set customDevTools in VS Code to run with --wasm

    Then it loads:

    image

    However, I can't interact with the inspector.. clicking on items in the tree just doesn't do anything (no visible selection or anything). I do now have this error in the console, though it appears as the page loads (not when I click) so I'm not sure it's related:

    image

    However, if I open externally in the browser, then all is good (clicking in the inspector works), so it does seem like there's more broken in VS Code (I don't know if this might be why COI is still behind a flag or unrelated). I'll need to do some more debugging to try and figure out what's wrong here.

  17. kevmoo commented on Jul 10, 2024

    @kevmoo
    Contributor

    @DanTup – the cast is likely here:

    if (resp == null || !resp.statusOk || !(json.decode(resp.body) as bool)) {

    How hard is it to create a _decodeBoyAsBool function with some debug printing (instead of (json.decode(respo.body) as bool) – so we can see what's happening there?

  18. DanTup commented on Jul 10, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    Ah, thanks for the pointer. I can just use the dev tools to see the network response - and it's a string:

    image

    Looks like this was actually fixed recently via #7997 but I didn't have a dependency_override in DDS to get that fix in the server.

    I wasn't expecting it, but re-running with that fix included I can use the inspector tree fine :)

    image

    Maybe the release notes overlay was partially there absorbing the clicks or something? 🤷‍♂️

    So, in summary:

    • if the new version of devtools_shared gets rolled into the SDK
    • and we add ..add('Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy', 'cross-origin') to the DevTools server (I don't if there are security implications to consider before doing this)
    • and we run VS Code with COI enabled (currently code --enable-coi)

    Then it does appear to work (at least in my limited testing of clicking around the inspector). I don't know if/when VS Code will enable COI by default though (there's an issue at microsoft/vscode#186614 that I think is related).

  19. kenzieschmoll commented on Jul 10, 2024

    @kenzieschmoll
    MemberAuthor

    Then it does appear to work (at least in my limited testing of clicking around the inspector). I don't know if/when VS Code will enable COI by default though (there's an issue at microsoft/vscode#186614 that I think is related).

    Is there a way we can detect whether this is enabled, and fallback to using the dart2js version of DevTools if it is not?

  20. kevmoo commented on Jul 10, 2024

    @kevmoo
    Contributor

    @kenzieschmoll – we'll have to ask @eyebrowsoffire – or just try it out. I'm pretty sure we do automatically fallback in most failure cases, just not sure of this one.

  21. DanTup commented on Jul 10, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    Is there a way we can detect whether this is enabled, and fallback to using the dart2js version of DevTools if it is not?

    This already happens, because window.crossOriginIsolated is false in that case and the WASM version is only selected when it's true (plus some other conditions noted further up).

  22. DanTup commented on Jul 10, 2024

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    But, I think we do need to add that extra header in to the DevTools server, otherwise I think we could load the WASM version but then fail with the error shown above at #7856 (comment).

  23. eyebrowsoffire commented on Jul 11, 2024

    @eyebrowsoffire
    Contributor

    Note: We do fall back to CanvasKit + JS if window.crossOriginIsolated is false

  24. kenzieschmoll commented on Oct 3, 2024

    @kenzieschmoll
    MemberAuthor

    This work is complete. DevTools + Wasm will be shipped as an opt-in feature behind a DevTools setting for the Q4 Dart / Flutter stable release. We will aim to turn this on by default for the Q1 2025 stable release, tracked here: #8395

  25. DanTup commented on Apr 7, 2025

    @DanTup
    Contributor

    @kenzieschmoll FYI, I did more testing of the wasm version in VS Code this morning, and I was unable to repro the performance issues I'd recalled (which we discussed a little in Dart-Code/Dart-Code#5367). I also tried embedding DevTools in an iframe outside of VS Code (so no Cross-Origin-Isolation) and failed to reproduce there.

    I'll leave the wasm experiment on and keep an eye on it, but as things are I think the issue is gone (or, it's a much smaller issue than it was when I first hit it).

  26. kevmoo commented on Apr 7, 2025

    @kevmoo
    Contributor

    That's great new @DanTup ! Thanks for reporting!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

P1high priority issues at the top of the work list, actively being worked on.dart2wasm

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions