Skip to content

fix: get content hash for master on local engine branches - #172792

Merged
auto-submit[bot] merged 5 commits into
flutter:masterfrom
jtmcdole:localHashBypass
Jul 26, 2025
Merged

auto-submit[bot] merged 5 commits into
flutter:masterfrom
jtmcdole:localHashBypass

Conversation

@jtmcdole

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes to engine files; use "master".

towards #171790

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes; so fetch the
one from master.
@jtmcdole
jtmcdole requested a review from matanlurey July 25, 2025 21:13
@jtmcdole

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

fyi @robert-ancell / @mdebbar / @gaaclarke / @bdero who had problems with this.

@matanlurey matanlurey left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM based on tests :)

@jtmcdole jtmcdole added the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Jul 25, 2025
@bdero

bdero commented Jul 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It looks like content_aware_hash.sh doesn't produce the hash at the common ancestor with main w/ these changes (tried with branch bdero:bdero/gles-fixes-redux #172588.

❯ export FLUTTER_PREBUILT_ENGINE_VERSION=$(~/projects/flutter/flutter/bin/internal/content_aware_hash.sh)
❯ flutter --version
Downloading engine information...                                  260ms
Downloading engine information...                                  101ms
Failed to download
https://storage.googleapis.com/flutter_infra_release/flutter/e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391/engine_stamp.json. Ensure you have
network connectivity and then try again.
Exception: 404

@bdero

bdero commented Jul 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Unless perhaps the content_aware_hash.sh is including the diff of content_aware_hash.sh... lol

@jtmcdole

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

It looks like content_aware_hash.sh doesn't produce the hash at the common ancestor with main w/ these changes (tried with branch bdero:bdero/gles-fixes-redux #172588.

❯ export FLUTTER_PREBUILT_ENGINE_VERSION=$(~/projects/flutter/flutter/bin/internal/content_aware_hash.sh)
❯ flutter --version
Downloading engine information...                                  260ms
Downloading engine information...                                  101ms
Failed to download
https://storage.googleapis.com/flutter_infra_release/flutter/e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391/engine_stamp.json. Ensure you have
network connectivity and then try again.
Exception: 404

main should be banned and we should remove it. :)

@jtmcdole jtmcdole removed the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Jul 25, 2025
@jtmcdole

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Tweaking - the "$BASEREF" should be the actual merge-base

@bdero bdero left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works with new diff. :)

@jtmcdole

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Works with new diff. :)

Thanks for confirming! I have to fix tests now since "origin/master" doesn't exist in the test repo

@jtmcdole jtmcdole added the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Jul 25, 2025
@auto-submit auto-submit Bot removed the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Jul 25, 2025
@auto-submit

auto-submit Bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

autosubmit label was removed for flutter/flutter/172792, because - The status or check suite Mac tool_integration_tests_3_5 has failed. Please fix the issues identified (or deflake) before re-applying this label.

@jtmcdole jtmcdole added the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Jul 25, 2025
@jtmcdole

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

autosubmit label was removed for flutter/flutter/172792, because - The status or check suite Mac tool_integration_tests_3_5 has failed. Please fix the issues identified (or deflake) before re-applying this label.

its a flake. rerun passed.

@jtmcdole
jtmcdole added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 25, 2025
@jtmcdole
jtmcdole removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jul 25, 2025
@flutter-dashboard flutter-dashboard Bot removed the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Jul 25, 2025
@jtmcdole
jtmcdole added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 25, 2025
@jtmcdole
jtmcdole removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jul 25, 2025
@jtmcdole jtmcdole added the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Jul 26, 2025
@auto-submit
auto-submit Bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 26, 2025
Merged via the queue into flutter:master with commit e2d591c Jul 26, 2025
github-merge-queue Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2025
…mpt) (#173169)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards #171790

re-land attempt for #173114 (try 2)
re-land attempt for #172792 (original)

The first commit in this PR is the previously LGTM'd changes for the
above; with tests.

The second commit is the critical change to make this work in post
submits (fixes #173143). It turns out that while LUCI reports the GitHub
private branches; our recipes directly checkout the git sha. This
matters because the content scripts couldn't determine the branch name
and the rev-parse was just HEAD. This lead the scripts down the
merge-base logic, which returns the previous commit.

A test was added specifically for this.

Alternatively to this change, we could have checked for LUCI_CONTEXT
being present in the environment. This is checked by Flutter tools in
some cases, but not by any other scripts in `bin/internal`. The downside
to checking HEAD: if you have a local branch with engine changes and you
move back a revision - `dart`/`flutter` invocations will generate the
hash for your local changes and fail.
danilozhang pushed a commit to danilozhang/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
…mpt) (flutter#173169)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#173114 (try 2)
re-land attempt for flutter#172792 (original)

The first commit in this PR is the previously LGTM'd changes for the
above; with tests.

The second commit is the critical change to make this work in post
submits (fixes flutter#173143). It turns out that while LUCI reports the GitHub
private branches; our recipes directly checkout the git sha. This
matters because the content scripts couldn't determine the branch name
and the rev-parse was just HEAD. This lead the scripts down the
merge-base logic, which returns the previous commit.

A test was added specifically for this.

Alternatively to this change, we could have checked for LUCI_CONTEXT
being present in the environment. This is checked by Flutter tools in
some cases, but not by any other scripts in `bin/internal`. The downside
to checking HEAD: if you have a local branch with engine changes and you
move back a revision - `dart`/`flutter` invocations will generate the
hash for your local changes and fail.
SydneyBao pushed a commit to SydneyBao/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
…3114)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
SydneyBao pushed a commit to SydneyBao/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
…lutter#173114)" (flutter#173145)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#173114
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: there is still another problem with the merge
queue causing the content hash to be different:

git revision: e13dd53
actual hash: 4b6f7b0f9849efaa59f515c8e95f3f27a6eb2ffb
hash in the queue? 9e5b2eef4ba79b15b4f80dbba812d199d262366f



<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey, chingjun}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
SydneyBao pushed a commit to SydneyBao/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
…mpt) (flutter#173169)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#173114 (try 2)
re-land attempt for flutter#172792 (original)

The first commit in this PR is the previously LGTM'd changes for the
above; with tests.

The second commit is the critical change to make this work in post
submits (fixes flutter#173143). It turns out that while LUCI reports the GitHub
private branches; our recipes directly checkout the git sha. This
matters because the content scripts couldn't determine the branch name
and the rev-parse was just HEAD. This lead the scripts down the
merge-base logic, which returns the previous commit.

A test was added specifically for this.

Alternatively to this change, we could have checked for LUCI_CONTEXT
being present in the environment. This is checked by Flutter tools in
some cases, but not by any other scripts in `bin/internal`. The downside
to checking HEAD: if you have a local branch with engine changes and you
move back a revision - `dart`/`flutter` invocations will generate the
hash for your local changes and fail.
ksokolovskyi pushed a commit to ksokolovskyi/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
…2792)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  flutter#171790
ksokolovskyi pushed a commit to ksokolovskyi/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
…lutter#172792)" (flutter#172805)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#172792
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: almost, but not quite right. android builders
generate the wrong hash because they are on custom branches.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {bdero, matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  flutter#171790 

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
ksokolovskyi pushed a commit to ksokolovskyi/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
…3114)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
ksokolovskyi pushed a commit to ksokolovskyi/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
…lutter#173114)" (flutter#173145)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#173114
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: there is still another problem with the merge
queue causing the content hash to be different:

git revision: e13dd53
actual hash: 4b6f7b0f9849efaa59f515c8e95f3f27a6eb2ffb
hash in the queue? 9e5b2eef4ba79b15b4f80dbba812d199d262366f



<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey, chingjun}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
ksokolovskyi pushed a commit to ksokolovskyi/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
…mpt) (flutter#173169)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#173114 (try 2)
re-land attempt for flutter#172792 (original)

The first commit in this PR is the previously LGTM'd changes for the
above; with tests.

The second commit is the critical change to make this work in post
submits (fixes flutter#173143). It turns out that while LUCI reports the GitHub
private branches; our recipes directly checkout the git sha. This
matters because the content scripts couldn't determine the branch name
and the rev-parse was just HEAD. This lead the scripts down the
merge-base logic, which returns the previous commit.

A test was added specifically for this.

Alternatively to this change, we could have checked for LUCI_CONTEXT
being present in the environment. This is checked by Flutter tools in
some cases, but not by any other scripts in `bin/internal`. The downside
to checking HEAD: if you have a local branch with engine changes and you
move back a revision - `dart`/`flutter` invocations will generate the
hash for your local changes and fail.
mboetger pushed a commit to mboetger/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
…2792)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  flutter#171790
mboetger pushed a commit to mboetger/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
…lutter#172792)" (flutter#172805)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#172792
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: almost, but not quite right. android builders
generate the wrong hash because they are on custom branches.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {bdero, matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  flutter#171790 

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
mboetger pushed a commit to mboetger/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
…3114)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
mboetger pushed a commit to mboetger/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
…lutter#173114)" (flutter#173145)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#173114
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: there is still another problem with the merge
queue causing the content hash to be different:

git revision: e13dd53
actual hash: 4b6f7b0f9849efaa59f515c8e95f3f27a6eb2ffb
hash in the queue? 9e5b2eef4ba79b15b4f80dbba812d199d262366f



<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey, chingjun}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
mboetger pushed a commit to mboetger/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
…mpt) (flutter#173169)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#173114 (try 2)
re-land attempt for flutter#172792 (original)

The first commit in this PR is the previously LGTM'd changes for the
above; with tests.

The second commit is the critical change to make this work in post
submits (fixes flutter#173143). It turns out that while LUCI reports the GitHub
private branches; our recipes directly checkout the git sha. This
matters because the content scripts couldn't determine the branch name
and the rev-parse was just HEAD. This lead the scripts down the
merge-base logic, which returns the previous commit.

A test was added specifically for this.

Alternatively to this change, we could have checked for LUCI_CONTEXT
being present in the environment. This is checked by Flutter tools in
some cases, but not by any other scripts in `bin/internal`. The downside
to checking HEAD: if you have a local branch with engine changes and you
move back a revision - `dart`/`flutter` invocations will generate the
hash for your local changes and fail.
korca0220 pushed a commit to korca0220/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
…2792)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  flutter#171790
korca0220 pushed a commit to korca0220/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
…lutter#172792)" (flutter#172805)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#172792
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: almost, but not quite right. android builders
generate the wrong hash because they are on custom branches.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {bdero, matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  flutter#171790 

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
korca0220 pushed a commit to korca0220/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
…3114)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
korca0220 pushed a commit to korca0220/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
…lutter#173114)" (flutter#173145)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#173114
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: there is still another problem with the merge
queue causing the content hash to be different:

git revision: e13dd53
actual hash: 4b6f7b0f9849efaa59f515c8e95f3f27a6eb2ffb
hash in the queue? 9e5b2eef4ba79b15b4f80dbba812d199d262366f



<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey, chingjun}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
korca0220 pushed a commit to korca0220/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
…mpt) (flutter#173169)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#173114 (try 2)
re-land attempt for flutter#172792 (original)

The first commit in this PR is the previously LGTM'd changes for the
above; with tests.

The second commit is the critical change to make this work in post
submits (fixes flutter#173143). It turns out that while LUCI reports the GitHub
private branches; our recipes directly checkout the git sha. This
matters because the content scripts couldn't determine the branch name
and the rev-parse was just HEAD. This lead the scripts down the
merge-base logic, which returns the previous commit.

A test was added specifically for this.

Alternatively to this change, we could have checked for LUCI_CONTEXT
being present in the environment. This is checked by Flutter tools in
some cases, but not by any other scripts in `bin/internal`. The downside
to checking HEAD: if you have a local branch with engine changes and you
move back a revision - `dart`/`flutter` invocations will generate the
hash for your local changes and fail.
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025
lucaantonelli pushed a commit to lucaantonelli/flutter that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
…2792)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  flutter#171790
lucaantonelli pushed a commit to lucaantonelli/flutter that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
…lutter#172792)" (flutter#172805)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#172792
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: almost, but not quite right. android builders
generate the wrong hash because they are on custom branches.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {bdero, matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  flutter#171790 

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
lucaantonelli pushed a commit to lucaantonelli/flutter that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
…3114)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
lucaantonelli pushed a commit to lucaantonelli/flutter that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
…lutter#173114)" (flutter#173145)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter#173114
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: there is still another problem with the merge
queue causing the content hash to be different:

git revision: e13dd53
actual hash: 4b6f7b0f9849efaa59f515c8e95f3f27a6eb2ffb
hash in the queue? 9e5b2eef4ba79b15b4f80dbba812d199d262366f



<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey, chingjun}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#172792  with the following changes:

1. content_aware_hash.(ps1|sh) now consider multiple branches to choose
between HEAD and merge-base.
2. content_aware_hash_test.dart updated for these new requirements 
3. content_aware_hash_test.dart allows for forcing powershell on mac for
testing
4. updated docs/tool/Engine-artifacts.md documentation.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
lucaantonelli pushed a commit to lucaantonelli/flutter that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
…mpt) (flutter#173169)

The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards flutter#171790

re-land attempt for flutter#173114 (try 2)
re-land attempt for flutter#172792 (original)

The first commit in this PR is the previously LGTM'd changes for the
above; with tests.

The second commit is the critical change to make this work in post
submits (fixes flutter#173143). It turns out that while LUCI reports the GitHub
private branches; our recipes directly checkout the git sha. This
matters because the content scripts couldn't determine the branch name
and the rev-parse was just HEAD. This lead the scripts down the
merge-base logic, which returns the previous commit.

A test was added specifically for this.

Alternatively to this change, we could have checked for LUCI_CONTEXT
being present in the environment. This is checked by Flutter tools in
some cases, but not by any other scripts in `bin/internal`. The downside
to checking HEAD: if you have a local branch with engine changes and you
move back a revision - `dart`/`flutter` invocations will generate the
hash for your local changes and fail.
creatorpiyush pushed a commit to creatorpiyush/packages that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
Roll Flutter from 20788c0 to cfbaa18 (43 revisions)

flutter/flutter@20788c0...cfbaa18

2025-07-28 [email protected] Remove shortner (flutter/flutter#172844)
2025-07-28 [email protected] Update `flutter pub get` to use `flutter.version.json` (instead of `version`) (flutter/flutter#172798)
2025-07-27 [email protected] Roll Fuchsia Linux SDK from i7RS-4iBtdndwa3Jy... to tK_PAaLeo0pUxi8hv... (flutter/flutter#172827)
2025-07-26 [email protected] Roll Fuchsia Linux SDK from 4IewCwqcEm7r4QsXd... to i7RS-4iBtdndwa3Jy... (flutter/flutter#172808)
2025-07-26 98614782+auto-submit[bot]@users.noreply.github.com Reverts "fix: get content hash for master on local engine branches (#172792)" (flutter/flutter#172805)
2025-07-26 [email protected] fix: build size_exp artifacts in post (flutter/flutter#172802)
2025-07-26 [email protected] fix: get content hash for master on local engine branches (flutter/flutter#172792)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Update `main`/`master` repoExceptions analysis set (flutter/flutter#172796)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Remove deprecated `--[no-]-disable-dds` (flutter/flutter#172791)
2025-07-25 [email protected] `last_engine_commit.ps1`: Use `$flutterRoot` instead of `$gitTopLevel` (flutter/flutter#172786)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Check file contents, remove tests that are now invalid (`: 'none'`) (flutter/flutter#172788)
2025-07-25 [email protected] windows: allow pwsh.bat wrapper (flutter/flutter#171778)
2025-07-25 [email protected] [Impeller] Log glCheckFrameBufferStatus output when it fails in blit pass. (flutter/flutter#172592)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Remove deprecated `AssetManifest.json` file (flutter/flutter#172594)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Refactor `verifyVersion` into typed `Version` object, use it (flutter/flutter#172780)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Bump the customer tests to pick up an update to Zulip's tests, for th… (flutter/flutter#172733)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Rename `AppRunLogger`, stop writing status messages that break JSON (flutter/flutter#172591)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Add `--dart-define`, `-D` to `assemble`, deprecate `--define`, `-d`. (flutter/flutter#172510)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Fix previous text input connection interrupts enter/space (flutter/flutter#171973)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Update CHANGELOG.md for 3.32.8 (flutter/flutter#172779)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Fix an `omit-type` lint that is breaking the tree (flutter/flutter#172776)
2025-07-25 [email protected] feat(tool): Respect user-data-dir flag from web-browser-flag (flutter/flutter#169445)
2025-07-25 [email protected] [web] Fix empty first frame in multiview mode (flutter/flutter#172493)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Migrate to null aware elements - Part 3 (flutter/flutter#172307)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Update few links in docs (flutter/flutter#172166)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Roll Skia from 768ace3fd144 to 409e1c7ba09b (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#172745)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Roll Fuchsia Linux SDK from a_55b5hqpRnigzuNC... to 4IewCwqcEm7r4QsXd... (flutter/flutter#172742)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Roll Skia from 094ac350125f to 768ace3fd144 (18 revisions) (flutter/flutter#172735)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Remove 2023 deprecated `'platforms'` key from daemon output (flutter/flutter#172593)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Manual roll of Dart from 26dece893751 to 5ede85aff798 (flutter/flutter#172731)
2025-07-24 [email protected] 169108 ci debug (flutter/flutter#172589)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Improve assertion message in `_MixedBorderRadius.resolve()` (flutter/flutter#172100)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that a BottomAppBar doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172097)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Handle#6537 bottom navigation bar (flutter/flutter#172404)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that a MaterialBanner doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172074)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Remove support for `pluginClass: none` (on `master`; `> 3.35.0`) (flutter/flutter#172579)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that a Card doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172373)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that an AboutDialog doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172444)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that an ActionChip doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172684)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Delete (unused) `dev/checks_tool` directory (flutter/flutter#172715)
2025-07-24 [email protected] [Android] Add missing ci configuration for `Linux android_java17_tool_integration_tests` (flutter/flutter#172702)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Flutter-Cherrypick-Process.md - Spell cherry-pick consistently (flutter/flutter#172697)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Bringup `linux_web_engine_tests`; failing 4+ times in a row (flutter/flutter#172714)

If this roll has caused a breakage, revert this CL and stop the roller
using the controls here:
...
bisor0627 pushed a commit to bisor0627/packages that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2026
Roll Flutter from 20788c0 to cfbaa18 (43 revisions)

flutter/flutter@20788c0...cfbaa18

2025-07-28 [email protected] Remove shortner (flutter/flutter#172844)
2025-07-28 [email protected] Update `flutter pub get` to use `flutter.version.json` (instead of `version`) (flutter/flutter#172798)
2025-07-27 [email protected] Roll Fuchsia Linux SDK from i7RS-4iBtdndwa3Jy... to tK_PAaLeo0pUxi8hv... (flutter/flutter#172827)
2025-07-26 [email protected] Roll Fuchsia Linux SDK from 4IewCwqcEm7r4QsXd... to i7RS-4iBtdndwa3Jy... (flutter/flutter#172808)
2025-07-26 98614782+auto-submit[bot]@users.noreply.github.com Reverts "fix: get content hash for master on local engine branches (#172792)" (flutter/flutter#172805)
2025-07-26 [email protected] fix: build size_exp artifacts in post (flutter/flutter#172802)
2025-07-26 [email protected] fix: get content hash for master on local engine branches (flutter/flutter#172792)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Update `main`/`master` repoExceptions analysis set (flutter/flutter#172796)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Remove deprecated `--[no-]-disable-dds` (flutter/flutter#172791)
2025-07-25 [email protected] `last_engine_commit.ps1`: Use `$flutterRoot` instead of `$gitTopLevel` (flutter/flutter#172786)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Check file contents, remove tests that are now invalid (`: 'none'`) (flutter/flutter#172788)
2025-07-25 [email protected] windows: allow pwsh.bat wrapper (flutter/flutter#171778)
2025-07-25 [email protected] [Impeller] Log glCheckFrameBufferStatus output when it fails in blit pass. (flutter/flutter#172592)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Remove deprecated `AssetManifest.json` file (flutter/flutter#172594)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Refactor `verifyVersion` into typed `Version` object, use it (flutter/flutter#172780)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Bump the customer tests to pick up an update to Zulip's tests, for th… (flutter/flutter#172733)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Rename `AppRunLogger`, stop writing status messages that break JSON (flutter/flutter#172591)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Add `--dart-define`, `-D` to `assemble`, deprecate `--define`, `-d`. (flutter/flutter#172510)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Fix previous text input connection interrupts enter/space (flutter/flutter#171973)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Update CHANGELOG.md for 3.32.8 (flutter/flutter#172779)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Fix an `omit-type` lint that is breaking the tree (flutter/flutter#172776)
2025-07-25 [email protected] feat(tool): Respect user-data-dir flag from web-browser-flag (flutter/flutter#169445)
2025-07-25 [email protected] [web] Fix empty first frame in multiview mode (flutter/flutter#172493)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Migrate to null aware elements - Part 3 (flutter/flutter#172307)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Update few links in docs (flutter/flutter#172166)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Roll Skia from 768ace3fd144 to 409e1c7ba09b (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#172745)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Roll Fuchsia Linux SDK from a_55b5hqpRnigzuNC... to 4IewCwqcEm7r4QsXd... (flutter/flutter#172742)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Roll Skia from 094ac350125f to 768ace3fd144 (18 revisions) (flutter/flutter#172735)
2025-07-25 [email protected] Remove 2023 deprecated `'platforms'` key from daemon output (flutter/flutter#172593)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Manual roll of Dart from 26dece893751 to 5ede85aff798 (flutter/flutter#172731)
2025-07-24 [email protected] 169108 ci debug (flutter/flutter#172589)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Improve assertion message in `_MixedBorderRadius.resolve()` (flutter/flutter#172100)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that a BottomAppBar doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172097)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Handle#6537 bottom navigation bar (flutter/flutter#172404)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that a MaterialBanner doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172074)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Remove support for `pluginClass: none` (on `master`; `> 3.35.0`) (flutter/flutter#172579)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that a Card doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172373)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that an AboutDialog doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172444)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Make sure that an ActionChip doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#172684)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Delete (unused) `dev/checks_tool` directory (flutter/flutter#172715)
2025-07-24 [email protected] [Android] Add missing ci configuration for `Linux android_java17_tool_integration_tests` (flutter/flutter#172702)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Flutter-Cherrypick-Process.md - Spell cherry-pick consistently (flutter/flutter#172697)
2025-07-24 [email protected] Bringup `linux_web_engine_tests`; failing 4+ times in a row (flutter/flutter#172714)

If this roll has caused a breakage, revert this CL and stop the roller
using the controls here:
...
Nakiha pushed a commit to Nakiha/VoidPlayer-Flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2026
…172792)" (#172805)

<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#172792
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: almost, but not quite right. android builders
generate the wrong hash because they are on custom branches.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->

<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {bdero, matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->

<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The content hash doesn't exist for local engine changes, except for on
CI. If we detect we're on a branch with committed or uncommitted changes
to engine files; use "master".

towards  #171790 

<!-- end_revert_body -->

Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants