Skip to content

fix lookup regression again - #26762

Merged
Nathan Shively-Sanders (sandersn) merged 2 commits into
microsoft:masterfrom
Kingwl:fix_lookup_regression
Aug 30, 2018
Merged

Nathan Shively-Sanders (sandersn) merged 2 commits into
microsoft:masterfrom
Kingwl:fix_lookup_regression

Conversation

@Kingwl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #26731

@RyanCavanaugh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wenlu Wang (@Kingwl) thank you for the follow-up! Can you please add a testcase with the repro from the linked issue?

@ajafff

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ryan Cavanaugh (@RyanCavanaugh) the baseline change is actually the same as my repro in the linked issue

@RyanCavanaugh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Klaus Meinhardt (@ajafff) true. I'd still prefer an explicit example - we are much more likely to notice an error file going from 0 to 1 or vice versa than a type baseline changing.

@Kingwl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

sure, wait a few moment

@sandersn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the second fix Wenlu Wang (@Kingwl).

@sandersn
Nathan Shively-Sanders (sandersn) merged commit 038f665 into microsoft:master Aug 30, 2018
@Kingwl
Wenlu Wang (Kingwl) deleted the fix_lookup_regression branch August 30, 2018 16:04
@Kingwl

Wenlu Wang (Kingwl) commented Aug 30, 2018 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Nathan Shively-Sanders (@sandersn)
Actually, I hope there are nothing to fix. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Ryan Cavanaugh (RyanCavanaugh) added a commit to RyanCavanaugh/TypeScript that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2018
Ryan Cavanaugh (RyanCavanaugh) added a commit to RyanCavanaugh/TypeScript that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2018
…ration for a clean PR fixing all the issues.
@microsoft Microsoft (microsoft) locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants