Since #603, a title word in a part past the second comma reads as a title (rules.md#C2). A trailing period-marked title behind a particle in that part doesn't, because the particle chain takes it first:
| Input |
Today |
John Smith, Jr., Prof. |
title 'Prof.', suffix 'Jr.' |
John Smith, Jr., van der Berg Prof. |
suffix 'Jr., van der Berg Prof.' |
John Smith, Jr., Freiherr von Richthofen |
title 'Freiherr', suffix 'Jr., von Richthofen' |
1.4.0 reads suffix 'Jr., van der Berg Prof.' too. This is the tail-part twin of #623, which fixed the same thing in a family comma's given part by bounding the chain with _pieces.trailing_run_start. #623's review found it by applying that bound at every site: 2,872 generated tail-part inputs moved.
Question: does C2's title reading reach a trailing title behind a particle in a tail part? The input is garbage-adjacent (a particle surname after the suffix comma), so "no, leave it" is a fair answer.
Since #603, a title word in a part past the second comma reads as a title (rules.md#C2). A trailing period-marked title behind a particle in that part doesn't, because the particle chain takes it first:
John Smith, Jr., Prof.John Smith, Jr., van der Berg Prof.John Smith, Jr., Freiherr von Richthofen1.4.0 reads suffix 'Jr., van der Berg Prof.' too. This is the tail-part twin of #623, which fixed the same thing in a family comma's given part by bounding the chain with
_pieces.trailing_run_start. #623's review found it by applying that bound at every site: 2,872 generated tail-part inputs moved.Question: does C2's title reading reach a trailing title behind a particle in a tail part? The input is garbage-adjacent (a particle surname after the suffix comma), so "no, leave it" is a fair answer.